2020
DOI: 10.1177/0263276420910484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clothing Degree Zero: A Late Reading of Barthes’ Fashion ‘System’

Abstract: Drawing upon Roland Barthes’ posthumously published notebooks from his 1974 trip to China, in which he remarks upon the ‘complete absence of fashion. Clothing degree zero’, this article offers a ‘late’ reading of Barthes’ interest in fashion, suggested here as a form of writing. In reference to the late works, specifically Barthes’ penultimate lecture course on the Neutral and Travels in China, supplemented by François Jullien’s comments on Barthes’ trip to China (regarding the use of the term ‘blandness’), as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reading Barthes with a feminist and political theorist’s eye opens new avenues of interpretation for his work. Barthes’s late work, including his lectures on the Neutral, has been recently revisited, highlighting its underrated interests in the domains of literary theory and textual analysis (Zhuo 2020), cultural critique (Badmington 2020; Feng 2020), and arts (Burgin 2020), sometimes with a gender and sexuality perspective (Gallop 2012; Proulx 2016; Zhuo 2017). Yet, Barthes’s insights for ethical and political theory have not been fully explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reading Barthes with a feminist and political theorist’s eye opens new avenues of interpretation for his work. Barthes’s late work, including his lectures on the Neutral, has been recently revisited, highlighting its underrated interests in the domains of literary theory and textual analysis (Zhuo 2020), cultural critique (Badmington 2020; Feng 2020), and arts (Burgin 2020), sometimes with a gender and sexuality perspective (Gallop 2012; Proulx 2016; Zhuo 2017). Yet, Barthes’s insights for ethical and political theory have not been fully explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%