2017
DOI: 10.1002/cem.2975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closure constraint in multivariate curve resolution

Abstract: Multivariate curve resolution techniques try to estimate physically and/or chemically meaningful profiles underlying a set of chemical or related measurements. However, the estimation of profiles is not generally unique and it is often complicated by intensity and rotational ambiguities. Constraints as further information of chemical entities can be imposed to reduce the extent of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To solve Equation 1, a number of components and initial estimates of either C or S T should be proposed and an iterative optimization using an alternating least squares (ALS) algorithm is performed to estimate the concentration (in C), and spectra (in S T ) profiles of the constituents (components) which better describe the analyzed data matrix, D. During the ALS optimization, different constraints like non-negativity, unimodality, closure, or local rank and selectivity can be applied to decrease the rotation ambiguities associated to the bilinear model and facilitate the convergence to chemically meaningful solutions. See references [19,21,24,35] for more details of the MCR-ALS procedure.…”
Section: Theory and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To solve Equation 1, a number of components and initial estimates of either C or S T should be proposed and an iterative optimization using an alternating least squares (ALS) algorithm is performed to estimate the concentration (in C), and spectra (in S T ) profiles of the constituents (components) which better describe the analyzed data matrix, D. During the ALS optimization, different constraints like non-negativity, unimodality, closure, or local rank and selectivity can be applied to decrease the rotation ambiguities associated to the bilinear model and facilitate the convergence to chemically meaningful solutions. See references [19,21,24,35] for more details of the MCR-ALS procedure.…”
Section: Theory and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous works in which MCR-ALS was applied to second-order data for quantitative analysis, a post-processing calibration step was performed [35]. In the postprocessing calibration step first, the peak areas or heights of the resolved concentration profiles of the analytes in the calibration samples were regressed against their known analyte concentrations.…”
Section: Theory and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the closure constraint could not be applied: it acts as a mass balance and implies that the sum of the modelled concentration for all the modelled components is the same everywhere in the image. This is not applicable in multispectral imaging, whereas it finds useful applications in modelling chemical equilibria and reaction kinetics [ 41 ]. The intrinsic noise of the experimental technique does not allow for the implementation of unimodality constraints and the closure constraint had to be discarded because during the acquisition time, GNRs have the time to diffuse in and out from the sampled 2D section of the specimen, and a strict mass balance could not be applied.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These theorems define when data can be safely manipulated so as not to bias the equilibrium constants while still permitting the use of a non‐negativity constrained algorithm for the absorptivity values. They leverage a version of closure that is distinct from that which is employed in soft‐modeling techiniques because it exists inherently due to the experimental design, potentially involves all concentration profiles and has weights that may not be equal to one. The secondary implication is that the precise offset of each molar absorptivity curve can be calculated from the baseline offset, the stoichiometry, and the concentrations of the stock solutions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%