The Comprehensive Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-800188-2.00028-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also notable is the in vivo observation that, while CPE binds primarily to the villus tips in the small intestine, this toxin destroys the entire small intestinal villus (18,19). A possible insight into this phenomenon was provided by a recent study demonstrating that, in vitro, CPE-insensitive rat fibroblast cells are killed by supernatants from cultures of CPE-treated sensitive cells (20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also notable is the in vivo observation that, while CPE binds primarily to the villus tips in the small intestine, this toxin destroys the entire small intestinal villus (18,19). A possible insight into this phenomenon was provided by a recent study demonstrating that, in vitro, CPE-insensitive rat fibroblast cells are killed by supernatants from cultures of CPE-treated sensitive cells (20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, S. aureus α-toxin, which interacts with various cell types including epithelial cells, as well as leucocidins, which target leukocytes, play a major role in S. aureus infections [ 72 , 73 ]. C. perfringens enterotoxin specifically recognizes the enterocytes and is responsible for C. perfringens foodborne poisoning [ 74 , 75 ], whereas C. perfringens ε-toxin, which is produced in the intestine, passes through the intestinal barrier without significant alteration of intestinal cells, transits in the blood circulation, targets kidney cells, crosses the blood–brain barrier, and interacts with neurons and oligodendrocytes leading to glutamate release and subsequent neurological symptoms of excitation [ 76 ].…”
Section: Bacterial Protein Toxins Active At the Cell Membranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, that previous study used a noncellular model system (artificial membranes) lacking CPE receptors, making it necessary to evaluate the effects of mepacrine on CPE-induced cytotoxicity against host cells. This is important because, (i) the presence of receptors is essential for CPE-induced cytotoxicity at physiologically relevant CPE concentrations ( 28 , 29 ), (ii) in cells, these receptors remain associated with the CPE pore ( 11 ) and thus could affect the mepacrine sensitivity of CPE pores, and (iii) host cell responses to CPE are more complicated than those of artificial membranes, e.g., the presence of mepacrine could affect the ability of CPE-treated host cells to release membrane vesicles containing CPE pores ( 30 ) or to degrade CPE pores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%