2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cimid.2018.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clostridioides difficile in the environment, food, animals and humans in southern Italy: Occurrence and genetic relatedness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To complement the data obtained during our first study, all strains isolated in ClosNEC and EPIFLORE were characterized by MLVA; MLST was performed on a subset of 69 strains representative of each MLVA-type from the three cohorts. Overall, typing data (MLVA, MLST) showed that both RT (CE)032 and (CE)847 were closely related to each other and to other well-described NTCD RT such as 140 [ 30 ] and 010 [ 31 ]. We confirmed that RT (CE)032 and (CE)847 frequently colonized the PN’s gut.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…To complement the data obtained during our first study, all strains isolated in ClosNEC and EPIFLORE were characterized by MLVA; MLST was performed on a subset of 69 strains representative of each MLVA-type from the three cohorts. Overall, typing data (MLVA, MLST) showed that both RT (CE)032 and (CE)847 were closely related to each other and to other well-described NTCD RT such as 140 [ 30 ] and 010 [ 31 ]. We confirmed that RT (CE)032 and (CE)847 frequently colonized the PN’s gut.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The prevalent ribotypes in cattle RT-078 and RT-126 are also frequently isolated in human medicine in Italy [17,59]. Ribotype 010 was not associated with genes coding for virulence factors [60,61] and may be classified as associated with cattle and clinically nonrelevant [62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…All peer-reviewed studies, dissertations and reports containing original prevalence data were eligible. Studies lacking the report of both number of samples tested (N) and number of positive samples (n) were excluded (20). Prevalence contamination data was only extracted for culture assays, and not for prevalence data based on molecular assays (21).…”
Section: Systematic Review Team and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%