2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection burden in Japan: A multicenter prospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of 1·04 cases per 10 000 patient‐days in japan was lower than that the rates of hospital‐onset CDI reported in previous multicentre studies conducted in Western countries (4·1–8·4 cases per 10 000 patient‐days) (Kobayashi et al ). However, recent studies reported no considerable difference in the incidence of CDI (Kato et al ); moreover, cases of CDI could be underdiagnosed. Mortality at 30 days has been reported to be 9–38% (Mitchell and Gardner ) in Western countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The incidence of 1·04 cases per 10 000 patient‐days in japan was lower than that the rates of hospital‐onset CDI reported in previous multicentre studies conducted in Western countries (4·1–8·4 cases per 10 000 patient‐days) (Kobayashi et al ). However, recent studies reported no considerable difference in the incidence of CDI (Kato et al ); moreover, cases of CDI could be underdiagnosed. Mortality at 30 days has been reported to be 9–38% (Mitchell and Gardner ) in Western countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A recent prospective study of 20 Japanese hospital wards by Kato and colleagues [30] found an overall CDI incidence (7.4/10,000 patient-days) that was higher than previously reported and suggested that patients were being missed due to inadequate CDI testing. However, the CDI incidence varied widely (from 0.6 to 75.5/ 10,000 patient-days) depending on the type of ward, as did the testing frequency (3.6e256.8/10,000 patient-days) [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A recent prospective study of 20 Japanese hospital wards by Kato and colleagues [30] found an overall CDI incidence (7.4/10,000 patient-days) that was higher than previously reported and suggested that patients were being missed due to inadequate CDI testing. However, the CDI incidence varied widely (from 0.6 to 75.5/ 10,000 patient-days) depending on the type of ward, as did the testing frequency (3.6e256.8/10,000 patient-days) [30]. At study end, we observed a CDI incidence of 0.99/10,000 patient-days, which is lower than that reported by the Kato study and another Japanese retrospective cohort study (3.11/10,000 patient-days) [13], as well as that estimated in a recent global systematic review (3.54/10,000 patient-days) [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A systematic review shows that prevalence of CDI in Japanese hospitals is lower than that of US and European countries because of under-diagnosis (Riley & Kimura, 2018). Another study shows that numerous patients with CDI are being overlooked due to inadequate diagnostic testing in Japan (Kato et al, 2019). These studies could support the first explanation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%