2005
DOI: 10.2118/84491-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closing the Gap: Fracture Half Length from Design, Buildup, and Production Analysis

Abstract: It is commonly observed that hydraulically fractured wells perform as though the "effective" fracture half-length is much lower than the designed half-length. This observation has been explained by various models, including poor fracture-height containment, poor proppant transport, proppant falling out of zone (convection), ineffective proppant-pack cleanup, capillary-phase trapping, multiphase flow, gravitational-phase segregation, and non-Darcy flow, with combinations of any of these mechanisms. With recent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study differs from that of Barree et al (2005) in that (1) a multifractured horizontal well is studied, whereas Barree et al (2005) focus on vertical wells; (2) hydraulic-fracture property estimates from RTA of single-and multiphase flowback are included in the analysis, whereas Barree et al (2005) do not discuss flowback analysis; (3) a tight-oil reservoir producing below bubble point at late stages of flowback and during on-line production is studied and hence corrections for multiphase flow are required for rigorous production analysis, whereas Barree et al (2005) use single-phase PTA and RTA methods.…”
Section: Description Of Flow Periods and Flow Regimes Observed In Fiecontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The current study differs from that of Barree et al (2005) in that (1) a multifractured horizontal well is studied, whereas Barree et al (2005) focus on vertical wells; (2) hydraulic-fracture property estimates from RTA of single-and multiphase flowback are included in the analysis, whereas Barree et al (2005) do not discuss flowback analysis; (3) a tight-oil reservoir producing below bubble point at late stages of flowback and during on-line production is studied and hence corrections for multiphase flow are required for rigorous production analysis, whereas Barree et al (2005) use single-phase PTA and RTA methods.…”
Section: Description Of Flow Periods and Flow Regimes Observed In Fiecontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Barree et al (2005) perform an analogous study to compare hydraulic-fracture property estimates from hydraulic-fracture modeling, postfracture flow and buildup (pressuretransient) analysis, and RTA for a tight-gas reservoir. Barree et al (2005) discuss the causes of the differences in hydraulic-fracture property estimates from each method.…”
Section: Description Of Flow Periods and Flow Regimes Observed In Fiementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The objective was to place the optimum amount of proppant and obtain the optimum effective half-length and conductivity without growing into the S8 coals. Because Baree et al 8 have shown the importance of regained permeability, it was decided to increase the breaker concentration in the water pad aggressively. Since this will be the fluid that will flow back at the end, the assumption is that it would clean up the fracture and improve the regained permeability.…”
Section: Pictured Cliffs Sandstone Stimulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barree et al (2003) mentions that phase segregation negatively impacts effective fracture length, yet he does not explain any possible causes for this. He also lists other causes for low effective fracture length, such as multiphase non-Darcy flow, inefficient cleanup, and capillary phase trapping.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%