2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2016.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closing the assessment loop on critical thinking: The challenges of multidimensional testing and low test-taking motivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
22
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Critical Thinking allows students to make logical and unbiased decisions, (Heijltjes, van Gog, Leppink, & Paas, 2014). A comprehensive assessment of critical thinking is also a multidimensional construct that includes reasoning, decision making, and problem solving skills (Bensley et al, 2016). This is also in line with Nurdyansyah and Musfiqon (2015) who state that the scientific approach to learning does not only focus on how to develop students' competencies in conducting observations or experiments but also focus on how to develop students' knowledge and thinking skills so that they can support creative and innovative activities.…”
Section:  Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical Thinking allows students to make logical and unbiased decisions, (Heijltjes, van Gog, Leppink, & Paas, 2014). A comprehensive assessment of critical thinking is also a multidimensional construct that includes reasoning, decision making, and problem solving skills (Bensley et al, 2016). This is also in line with Nurdyansyah and Musfiqon (2015) who state that the scientific approach to learning does not only focus on how to develop students' competencies in conducting observations or experiments but also focus on how to develop students' knowledge and thinking skills so that they can support creative and innovative activities.…”
Section:  Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to disentangle the contributions of ability and motivation is to measure motivation in addition to the ability being tested (e.g., Baumert and Demmrich, 2001;Bensley et al, 2016), based on expectancy-value theory that has its roots in part in motive, expectancy, and incentive as determinants of "aroused motivation to achieve" proposed by Atkinson (1957, p. 362).…”
Section: Theory and Assessment Of Test-taking Effort And Importance Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tinggi atau rendahnya kualitas pendidikan yang dihasilkan dari sekolah untuk siswa tidak terlepas dari berbagai faktor diantaranya adalah pengemasan pembelajaran (Adnyana, Ristiati, & Setiawan, 2014). Adanya kurang interaksi antara pengajar dan peserta didik Rath et al (1966) dalam Sudaryanto (2007), kurang beragam metode belajar guru (Tsai, 2012), kemampuan mental dan kecerdasan manusia yang lemah (Fatemipour & Kordnaeej, 2014), kurang usaha dalam meningkatkan modul ajar (Adair & Jaeger, 2016), kemampuan bernegosiasi siswa lambat (Aldhizer, 2015), watak dan metakognisi (Bensley, 2016), lingkungan pembelajaran siswa kurang memadai (Rudd, Baker, & Hoover, 2000) serta kurang mempunyai kemampuan komunikasi adalah ciri dari rendahnya kualitas pendidikan khususnya berpikir kritis (Panagiotis, 2011).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified