2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2790204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closing Out the DVA Debate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the debate on the controversial meaning of DVA, which can be realized only given one's own default, see for exampleGregory and German (2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the debate on the controversial meaning of DVA, which can be realized only given one's own default, see for exampleGregory and German (2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since both the surviving and the substituting counterparty are probably Banks with a mutual CSA agreement, the risk free close-out seems a reasonable assumption. The literature on the subject is rich (see, for example [79], [80], [92]), but, overall, the scientific community has not yet identified a definitive choice. In conclusion, the choice between risk free and risky close-out is a possible source of model risk uncertainty in the bCVA calculation.…”
Section: Close-outmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we decompose a bond yield f X t , where X is either equal to C, for the counterparty, or B for the bank, as 12 We adopt the riskless close-out convention, leading to perfectly collateralized exposures being used in the expressions for CVA and DVA. An important point, though, is that the value of future defaults may be incorporated into the close-out claim, put forth upon default, if a so-called risky close-out is performed (see [30,31]). However, for unsophisticated counterparties, such as the ones that tend to not have collateral agreements with the bank, we would expect a riskless closeout, in which the claim is based on the riskless value, since such counterparties are not likely to have the ability to calculate CVA and DVA.…”
Section: Financing the Collateral Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%