IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium 1992 Digest 1992
DOI: 10.1109/aps.1992.221580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closely spaced terminated monopoles for vehicular diversity antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One interpretation of this is that the presence of other antennas creates a slow-wave structure that, in effect, decreases the wavelength of the signal in their vicinity and, thus, increases the number of wavelengths separation between the elements. This phenomenon was first reported in [15] and has recently been reported in [16]. If it proves true, in general, that mutual coupling effects decrease correlation, then the closed-form expressions of the previous sections may be considered as upper bounds on the correlation between antennas in an electromagnetic field.…”
Section: G Cylindric Harmonic Modelmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…One interpretation of this is that the presence of other antennas creates a slow-wave structure that, in effect, decreases the wavelength of the signal in their vicinity and, thus, increases the number of wavelengths separation between the elements. This phenomenon was first reported in [15] and has recently been reported in [16]. If it proves true, in general, that mutual coupling effects decrease correlation, then the closed-form expressions of the previous sections may be considered as upper bounds on the correlation between antennas in an electromagnetic field.…”
Section: G Cylindric Harmonic Modelmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The correlation remained high for distances up to several wavelengths. However, a large reduction of correlations was measured for antenna separations of 0.2-0.4 wavelengths, due to mutual electromagnetic coupling effects [11]. (The main interest of this work was to what extent correlation is low, to obtain diversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical size of the antenna array is often limited by the application, for example in the case of portable transceivers. Antenna coupling may in such a case be so large that the nondiagonal entries cannot be ignored when one computes the directivity patterns and correlations of the channels [3,4]. A large coupling between the antennas will also impact the noise performance of the receiver front-end because the noise power delivered by an input port may excite other input ports via antenna coupling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%