1991
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/24/13/010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed summation of large perturbation orders: the s-d series for hydrogen in a magnetic field

Abstract: A 'method of the model series' is proposed which aims at making useful slowly convergent perturbation expansions. The large-order perturbation wavefunctions are covered in closed form with the help of a model series of proper asymptotic behaviour. The method is applied to Killingbeck's s-d expansion of the ground-state quadratic Zeeman effect. It produces accurate Zeeman energies at a moderate computational effort.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cross-sections used in this study are those of Schmidt [5] as shown in figure 1. In these cross-sections, anisotropic elastic collisions are employed with the first three partial crosssection differences, σ 0 − σ l (l 3) specified.…”
Section: Electrons In Methanementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cross-sections used in this study are those of Schmidt [5] as shown in figure 1. In these cross-sections, anisotropic elastic collisions are employed with the first three partial crosssection differences, σ 0 − σ l (l 3) specified.…”
Section: Electrons In Methanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suffice to say that periodic behaviour of electron properties in drift tubes is quite common, and can be explained physically in exactly the same way as for the Franck-Hertz experiment. In this paper, we consider a formalism suitable for dealing with both ions and electrons, and give results for electrons undergoing both conservative and nonconservative collisions, taking as examples methane gas [5] and the Lucas-Saelee model [6], respectively. The former is particularly interesting, since it exhibits marked negative differential conductivity (NDC), and requires a distinctly 'multi-term' analysis [2,[7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the ground state this regime is roughly given by γ = 0.2 − 20 (γ = B/B 0 is the magnetic field strength in atomic units, B 0 = hc/ea 2 0 = 2.3505•10 5 T). Both early [13] and more recent works [4,[14][15][16][17] on the hydrogen atom have used different approaches for relatively weak fields (the Coulomb force prevails over the magnetic force) and for very strong fields (the Coulomb force can be considered as weak in comparison with the magnetic forces which is the socalled adiabatic regime). In the latter regime the motion of the electron parallel to the magnetic field is dominated [18] by a 1D quasi-Coulomb potential including a parameter which depends on the magnetic field strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increasing degree of excitation the domain of the intermediate fields lowers correspondingly and becomes, as a rule, wider on a logarithmic scale of γ. Both early [15] and more recent works [5,[16][17][18][19] on the hydrogen atom have used different approaches for relatively weak fields (the Coulomb force prevails over the magnetic force) and for very strong fields where the Coulomb force can be considered as weak in comparison with the magnetic forces (adiabatic limit). In early works the Coulomb field was considered in this limit actually as perturbation for a free electron in a superstrong magnetic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%