The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1805233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery for Glycemic Control in Noncritical Care

Abstract: Among inpatients with type 2 diabetes receiving noncritical care, the use of an automated, closed-loop insulin-delivery system resulted in significantly better glycemic control than conventional subcutaneous insulin therapy, without a higher risk of hypoglycemia. (Funded by Diabetes UK and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01774565 .).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
120
1
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
120
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Bally et al recently applied artificial pancreas (AP) technology to establish euglycaemia in hospitalized patients with T2D in a general ward, that is, in a similar patient group. AP performance was comparable to that of GlucoTab with regard to mean glucose (8.5 ± 1.6 vs. 8.4 ± 1.2 mmol/L) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bally et al recently applied artificial pancreas (AP) technology to establish euglycaemia in hospitalized patients with T2D in a general ward, that is, in a similar patient group. AP performance was comparable to that of GlucoTab with regard to mean glucose (8.5 ± 1.6 vs. 8.4 ± 1.2 mmol/L) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Bally et al recently applied artificial pancreas (AP) technology to establish euglycaemia in hospitalized patients with T2D in a general ward, that is, in a similar patient group. AP performance was comparable to that of GlucoTab with regard to mean glucose (8.5 AE 1.AE 1.2 mmol/L) 28. Time within glucose target assessed by CGM (3.9-10 mmol/L) improved continuously during the course of treatment (61.8% vs 85.2%; first vs last treatment day) while time within hypoglycaemia (1.2% vs 0.6%; first vs last treatment day) substantially decreased.These data are superior to the CGM data seen with insulin glargine U100 in a comparable setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…These studies also highlight suboptimal glucose control in standard inpatient care: 41% time spent in the target range of 5.6-10.0 mmol/l in hospital ward settings and 73% in the critical care setting using VRIII. The comparable time-in-target values using closedloop insulin delivery were 66% and 92%, with negligible hypoglycaemia [13,14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Outside labour and delivery, closed-loop insulin delivery has been shown to improve time-in-target without increasing hypoglycaemia in inpatients with diabetes in critical care and hospital ward settings [13,14]. These studies also highlight suboptimal glucose control in standard inpatient care: 41% time spent in the target range of 5.6-10.0 mmol/l in hospital ward settings and 73% in the critical care setting using VRIII.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eine erste Studie untersuchte die Anwendung eines Artificial Pancreas (bestehend aus Insulinpumpe, CGM-System und Steuerungsalgorithmus) bei Patienten mit Typ-2-Diabetes auf der Normalstation. Dabei konnte eine deutlich bessere Blutglukoseeinstellung ohne erhöhtes Hypoglykämierisiko als unter subkutaner Insulintherapie erreicht werden [73]. Kommerzielle Systeme wurden unter diesen Bedingungen bisher nicht getestet und sind in Europa zum aktuellen Zeitpunkt auch nicht verfügbar.…”
Section: Artificial Pancreas Im Krankenhausunclassified