1991
DOI: 10.1214/ss/1177011699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed Form Summation for Classical Distributions: Variations on a Theme of De Moivre

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
110
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
110
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Then X for all continuous and piecewise differentiable functions f such that E[|f (X)|] < ∞ (see e.g. [4], [5], [21]). If the above expectation is non-zero but close to zero, Stein's method can give us a way to express how close the law of X might be to the standard normal law, in particular by using the concept of Stein equation.…”
Section: Stein's Methods and The Analysis Of Nourdin And Peccatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then X for all continuous and piecewise differentiable functions f such that E[|f (X)|] < ∞ (see e.g. [4], [5], [21]). If the above expectation is non-zero but close to zero, Stein's method can give us a way to express how close the law of X might be to the standard normal law, in particular by using the concept of Stein equation.…”
Section: Stein's Methods and The Analysis Of Nourdin And Peccatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that Stein's identity characterizes the normal distribution in an appropriately precise sense; one may see Diaconis and Zabell (1991). The following two questions, therefore, emerge naturally: We shall now address these two questions.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Heat Equation Identitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Diaconis and Zabell (1991) showed that the identity E((X − µ)h(X)) = E(h (X)) cannot hold for all C 1 c (R) functions except when X ∼ N (µ, 1). Interestingly, the inequality µ, m) and if h(·) is monotone nondecreasing, as we show below.…”
Section: Application To Decision Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refer to [6] and [26] for more information about Pearson distributions, and [8] for Stein's method applied to comparisons of probability tails with a Pearson Z. From Remark 4, if the support of Z is unbounded and g * is a polynomial, then Z is necessarily Pearson.…”
Section: Convergence When G * Is a Polynomialmentioning
confidence: 99%