2022
DOI: 10.3390/a15050151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed-Form Solution of the Bending Two-Phase Integral Model of Euler-Bernoulli Nanobeams

Abstract: Recent developments have shown that the widely used simplified differential model of Eringen’s nonlocal elasticity in nanobeam analysis is not equivalent to the corresponding and initially proposed integral models, the pure integral model and the two-phase integral model, in all cases of loading and boundary conditions. This has resolved a paradox with solutions that are not in line with the expected softening effect of the nonlocal theory that appears in all other cases. In addition, it revived interest in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We propose in this article another factorization method on two factors which successfully was applied in the articles by the authors [6], [7], [21]- [26] and by another author in [27]. Here we generalize the results of these papers and study a more complicated boundary value problem with an abstract operator equation…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We propose in this article another factorization method on two factors which successfully was applied in the articles by the authors [6], [7], [21]- [26] and by another author in [27]. Here we generalize the results of these papers and study a more complicated boundary value problem with an abstract operator equation…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Note that the operator B, by Theorem 3 (iii), since (24) and bijectivity of A, is bijective, and that taking into account (12) the system of equations ( 25), (26) can be represented as S 0 = B −1 V and G 0 = B −1 Y. The last system, because of bijectivity of B, is equivalent to the system V = BS 0 and Y = BG 0 , which is the system (7), (8). Then by Theorem 3 (i), the operator B 1 can be factorized in B 1 = BB 0 .…”
Section: Author Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…appears in the one-dimensional transport process [111] and the bending analysis of nonlocal integral models of Euler-Bernoulli nanobeams [112][113][114]. This equation, by removing the modulus in the integrand, can be converted to a Volterra-Fredholm integral equation of convolution type, namely…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%