2011
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2011.2158787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed-Form Green's Function Representations for Mutual Coupling Calculations Between Apertures on a Perfect Electric Conductor Circular Cylinder Covered With Dielectric Layers

Abstract: Closed-form Green's function (CFGF) representations are developed for tangential magnetic current sources to calculate the mutual coupling between apertures on perfectly conducting circular cylinders covered with dielectric layers. The new representations are obtained by first rewriting the corresponding spectral domain Green's function representations in a different form (so that accurate results for electrically large cylinders, and along the axial line of a cylinder can be obtained). Then, the summation ove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (7), t1 = t2 = 0 for the uv = zz, t1 = 0, t2 = 1 for the uv = zφ (= φz due to reciprocity), t1 = t2 = 1 for uv = φφ cases, whereas in (8), F −1 {·} denotes the inverse Fourier transform (IFT), n is the cylindrical eigenmode, β = ρφ and β = ρ φ , k the first, second, and the fourth terms are calculated in closed-form via generalized pencil of function (GPOF) method [23] on a deformed path (as done in [14]) since they do not have any singularity, whereas the third (axial line singularity related term) and the fifth (space domain singularity related term) terms are calculated analytically during the mutual admittance calculations. Although, (8) is obtained for every u and v, in this work we only use uv = zz case.…”
Section: Hm(ii) Uv2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (7), t1 = t2 = 0 for the uv = zz, t1 = 0, t2 = 1 for the uv = zφ (= φz due to reciprocity), t1 = t2 = 1 for uv = φφ cases, whereas in (8), F −1 {·} denotes the inverse Fourier transform (IFT), n is the cylindrical eigenmode, β = ρφ and β = ρ φ , k the first, second, and the fourth terms are calculated in closed-form via generalized pencil of function (GPOF) method [23] on a deformed path (as done in [14]) since they do not have any singularity, whereas the third (axial line singularity related term) and the fifth (space domain singularity related term) terms are calculated analytically during the mutual admittance calculations. Although, (8) is obtained for every u and v, in this work we only use uv = zz case.…”
Section: Hm(ii) Uv2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a third step, we subtract from , and the remaining term is approximated in terms of pole-residue expressions via the rational function fitting method (RFFM) [21], [22] as (15) where and are the normalized surface wave poles (SWPs) and the associated residues, respectively. The complex poles can be obtained through a modified vector fitting algorithm [21] or total least squares method [23], [24].…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, possible overflow/underflow problems are avoided during the series summation, making it possible to handle relatively large cylinders. Following this work, in [15] the CFGF representation is employed to analyze mutual coupling between apertures on a coated perfect electric conductor (PEC) cylinder. Numerical results provided in [14] and [15] show a good accuracy of mutual coupling results for a cylinder with a radius as large as , wherein is the free-space wavelength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where f 11 r1 , f 21 r2 , f 12 r3 , and f 22 r4 are the corresponding entries of the 2 × 2 matrixF r1 ,F r2 ,F r3 , andF r4 , which are the same as Equations (6)- (9) in [24].…”
Section: Eh Pqmentioning
confidence: 99%