2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-0190(01)00151-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed form bounds for clock synchronization under simple uncertainty assumptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the figure shows that PulseSync features a clearly sublinear dependence of the skew on D, as predicted by our analysis. This justifies the choice of a more optimistic system model, as it is known for long that the skew must be linear in D in the worst case [2]. These findings are not artifacts of unrealistic simulation parameters or network diameters; careful experiments confirm considerable improvements already for 5-10 hops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the figure shows that PulseSync features a clearly sublinear dependence of the skew on D, as predicted by our analysis. This justifies the choice of a more optimistic system model, as it is known for long that the skew must be linear in D in the worst case [2]. These findings are not artifacts of unrealistic simulation parameters or network diameters; careful experiments confirm considerable improvements already for 5-10 hops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This bound is probabilistic, whereas the worstcase accuracy that can be achieved is no smaller than D/2 in a general model where message delays vary arbitrarily in the range [0, 1] and clocks are perfect [2]. A worst-case upper bound of (1 + ρ)D can be achieved by a simple algorithm even if in addition clock speeds maybe vary arbitrarily between 1−ρ and 1+ρ [11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In clock synchronization research [13,6,20,4,7,14], system models are considered where the uncertainty comes from varying message delays, failures, and drifting clocks. Denoted "Partially Synchronous Reliable/Unreliable Models" in [23], such models are nowadays called (non-lockstep) synchronous models in literature.…”
Section: Classic Computing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it requires synchronized clocks. Highspeed networks like SAN may not increase the synchronization accuracy dramatically for atleast two reasons: synchronization accuracy is bound by message delay variance and not by the absolute delay ( [14], [4]); also, clock synchronization messages -being few tens of bytes long, may not see significant latency reduction even in gigabit networks. However, highspeed networks will need to handle higher number of active transactions in a given time-slice and hence require better clocks.…”
Section: Concurrency Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is understood that different ordering mechanisms -FIFO, casual, causally constrained total order and unconstrained total order 4 -guarantee different consistency semantics with cost and strictness increasing in that order. iSAN, being storage-consumer aware, deploys the suitable message ordering that suffices the storage-consumer's requirements.…”
Section: Concurrency Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%