2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.68.235412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Close packing of clusters:  Application toAl100

Abstract: The lowest energy configurations of close-packed clusters up to N = 110 atoms with stacking faults are studied using the Monte Carlo method with a Metropolis algorithm. Two types of contact interactions, a pair-potential and a many-atom interaction, are used. Enhanced stability is shown for N = 12, 26, 38, 50, 59, 61, 68, 75, 79, 86, 100 and 102, of which only the sizes 38, 75, 79, 86, and 102 are pure FCC clusters, the others having stacking faults. A connection between the model potential and density functio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(59 reference statements)
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…57 Distinct groups of low-energy structures were identified in those studies: distorted decahedral fragments, which are the global minima for clusters with around 36 and 55 atoms; rounded "disordered" structures which are the global minima close to the electron shell closings ͑at 138 and 198 electrons͒ predicted by the spherical jellium model; and fragments of a fcc crystalline lattice which are the global minima for the rest of sizes. Many of the fcc structures contain stacking faults ͑SFs͒, as previously predicted by Manninen et al 36 employing simpler energy models. Icosahedral isomers ͑favored by many parametrized aluminum potential models͒ were found to be high-energy isomers for all sizes.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…57 Distinct groups of low-energy structures were identified in those studies: distorted decahedral fragments, which are the global minima for clusters with around 36 and 55 atoms; rounded "disordered" structures which are the global minima close to the electron shell closings ͑at 138 and 198 electrons͒ predicted by the spherical jellium model; and fragments of a fcc crystalline lattice which are the global minima for the rest of sizes. Many of the fcc structures contain stacking faults ͑SFs͒, as previously predicted by Manninen et al 36 employing simpler energy models. Icosahedral isomers ͑favored by many parametrized aluminum potential models͒ were found to be high-energy isomers for all sizes.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…55,56 Except for Al 33 + , which adopts a SF structure with C 2v point group, these structures are obtained by removing atoms from the perfect distorted decahedral structure of Al 36 . All the GM structures will be made freely available to other researchers through the web.…”
Section: -5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Similar structures were also found in the literature for aluminum clusters. 18,47 III.C. Structural Growth in Al 140-310 Clusters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth simulations of TO clusters have revealed the formation of stacking faults (Baletto et al, 2000a;Valkealahti and Manninen, 1998). Manninen et al (2003); Manninen and Manninen (2002) showed that clusters with stacking faults are obtained also in the global optimization on an fcc lattice with all possible (111) stacking faults allowed, in the case of different model potentials.…”
Section: Aluminum Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%