2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020jb020840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Close Observation of Hydraulic Fracturing at EGS Collab Experiment 1: Fracture Trajectory, Microseismic Interpretations, and the Role of Natural Fractures

Abstract: The final version of the above article was posted prematurely on 16 July 2021, owing to a technical error. The final, corrected version of record will be made fully available at a later date.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On May 22, 2018, a 1 m interval of the injection borehole (I) centered at 50.3 m (165 ft) from the borehole collar was isolated using a high‐pressure straddle packer and stimulated to produce a hydrofracture as shown nominally in Figure 2a. During stimulation, the production borehole was left open to the atmosphere, and high‐pressure jet flow was observed (using a borehole camera) entering the borehole through hairline fractures over an approximately 2m interval near the anticipated hydro‐fracture/P‐well intersection (Fu et al., 2021). The same injection interval was later re‐isolated and used for the flow testing described in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On May 22, 2018, a 1 m interval of the injection borehole (I) centered at 50.3 m (165 ft) from the borehole collar was isolated using a high‐pressure straddle packer and stimulated to produce a hydrofracture as shown nominally in Figure 2a. During stimulation, the production borehole was left open to the atmosphere, and high‐pressure jet flow was observed (using a borehole camera) entering the borehole through hairline fractures over an approximately 2m interval near the anticipated hydro‐fracture/P‐well intersection (Fu et al., 2021). The same injection interval was later re‐isolated and used for the flow testing described in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following hydraulic fracturing convention, our drilling plan followed the common practice of drilling the injection and production wells parallel to the minimum principal stress, which at E1 was to the north and slightly dipping downwards. Owing to intense natural fracturing in and around the E1 site, we were aware of the potential for natural fracture shear stimulation and that one prominent foliation‐parallel permeable natural fracture (also called “OT‐P connector” by Fu et al., 2021) was close to the injection well. However, this natural fracture was not considered in the hydraulic fracturing design.…”
Section: Application To Egs Collab Experiments 1 and 2 Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When E1 was hydraulically stimulated, field data provided clear evidence that the fluid injection stimulated new hydraulic fractures and also produced flow through this prominent foliation‐parallel natural fracture. This data set included microseismic mapping, tracer circulation tests, and direct visual observations of flow into the production well (Fu et al., 2021). The field observation of these permeable fractures parallel to foliation is consistent with our laboratory based predictions that foliation‐parallel fractures are the most likely to be permeable.…”
Section: Application To Egs Collab Experiments 1 and 2 Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A handful of in situ field experiments have been conducted in recent years (Fu et al, 2021;Hertrich et al, 2021;Ingraham, 2021;Krietsch et al, 2020;Ma, 2021;Schoenball et al, 2020), which have significantly advanced our understanding of the hydro-seismo-mechanical processes at decameter scales; however, to what extent such experiments are representative of the realistic in situ heterogeneous rock mass remains an open question. As an effort to step up the scale towards hectometer rock masses (Gischig et al, 2020), the Bedretto Underground Laboratory for Geosciences and Geoenergies ('Bedretto Lab' hereafter) was established by ETH Zürich in 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%