2017
DOI: 10.1177/0013916517708598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Close and Connected: The Effects of Proximity and Social Ties on Citizen Opposition to Electricity Transmission Lines

Abstract: To meet reliability and renewable energy goals, new high-voltage transmission line (HVTL) projects are being built in the United States and worldwide. The siting of HVTLs, often considered a locally unwanted land use (LULU), can be difficult due to the negative externalities they create. Based on a survey of 358 residents of Chino Hills, California, we find that respondents' main concerns in regard to an HVTL project were health risks and harm to property values. Regression modeling finds that citizens who liv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of the proximity of these energy infrastructures to homes is also examined in several studies (see e.g. Nelson and Cain, 2017;Bjørn Aaen and Lyhne, 2016;Devine-Wright, 2012), framed under the so-called "Notin-My-Backyard" phenomenon, whereby the public perceives infrastructure projects as necessary, but opposes these projects in their own neighbourhoods (Schively, 2007). Yet the results of these studies are mixed showing that proximity may have a positive, negative or no impact on acceptance, depending 1 On overview legal limitation for the four investigated countries is provided in https://www.storeandgo.info/fileadmin/downloads/publications/Kreeft__G.J.__2018__-_Legislative_and_Regulatory_Framework_for_Power-to-Gas_in_Italy__Germany_and_Switzerland.pdf on type of power plant and national context considered (Ansolabehere and Konisky, 2009;Ek, 2005;Read et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the proximity of these energy infrastructures to homes is also examined in several studies (see e.g. Nelson and Cain, 2017;Bjørn Aaen and Lyhne, 2016;Devine-Wright, 2012), framed under the so-called "Notin-My-Backyard" phenomenon, whereby the public perceives infrastructure projects as necessary, but opposes these projects in their own neighbourhoods (Schively, 2007). Yet the results of these studies are mixed showing that proximity may have a positive, negative or no impact on acceptance, depending 1 On overview legal limitation for the four investigated countries is provided in https://www.storeandgo.info/fileadmin/downloads/publications/Kreeft__G.J.__2018__-_Legislative_and_Regulatory_Framework_for_Power-to-Gas_in_Italy__Germany_and_Switzerland.pdf on type of power plant and national context considered (Ansolabehere and Konisky, 2009;Ek, 2005;Read et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the demand for higher compensation may also be a signal of discontent, the causes of which, though not investigated in this study, could be the focus of future research. In particular, the specialist literature refers to several possible determinants (Nelson et al, 2017): mistrust toward the agencies responsible for siting, construction, and management (Ceglarz et al, 2017;Jenkin-Smith et al, 2009;Schively, 2007); lack of information and a sense of exclusion from the decision-making process (Lienert et al, 2018;Gross, 2007); a negative institutional context (Friedl and Reichl, 2016;Devine-Wright, 2009); and the lack of simplified and standardised regulatory frameworks (Battaglini et al, 2012). Hence, investigation of these further issues could improve findings in favour of conflict reduction, thus ensuring "procedural justice" and "social trust" with better policy outcomes (D'Souza and Yiridoe, 2014;Ritchie et al, 2013;Steinbach, 2013;Mohanty and Tandon, 2006;Roussopoulos, 2005;Casieri et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effect of 'risk denial' was revealed in previous risk perception research (Sjöberg, 2000) with individuals thinking they are less at risk when exposed to a technology compared to other people. Furthermore, perceived overall risk can evolve from different risk sources, e.g., accident risks, negative health effects, environmental damage, financial, social, and sustainability risks, as found, for example, for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) (L'Orange Seigo et al, 2014;Upham and Roberts, 2011) and transmission lines (Nelson et al, 2018). Another risk-relevant aspect can be fear of toxic effects of a substance.…”
Section: Risk Perceptions Regarding Toxic Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%