2001
DOI: 10.1006/pest.2001.2560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clopyralid Uptake, Translocation, Metabolism, and Ethylene Induction in Picloram-Resistant Yellow Starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Herbicide resistance mechanisms have been categorized into two types, (a) non‐target‐site, involving decreased absorption, translocation and/or enhanced herbicide metabolism, and (b) target‐site, resulting from mutations in the target gene or increases in levels of the target protein through gene amplification or transcriptional upregulation . Previous research found that auxinic herbicide resistance in wild mustard ( Sinapis arvensis ), false cleavers ( Galium spurium ), kochia ( Kochia scoparia ), and yellow starthistle ( Centaurea solstitialis ) was not attributable to differences in herbicide absorption, translocation and/or metabolism and, by deduction, might be attributable to other mechanisms, such as altered target site. A different dicamba‐resistant K. scoparia population was found to have reduced dicamba translocation …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herbicide resistance mechanisms have been categorized into two types, (a) non‐target‐site, involving decreased absorption, translocation and/or enhanced herbicide metabolism, and (b) target‐site, resulting from mutations in the target gene or increases in levels of the target protein through gene amplification or transcriptional upregulation . Previous research found that auxinic herbicide resistance in wild mustard ( Sinapis arvensis ), false cleavers ( Galium spurium ), kochia ( Kochia scoparia ), and yellow starthistle ( Centaurea solstitialis ) was not attributable to differences in herbicide absorption, translocation and/or metabolism and, by deduction, might be attributable to other mechanisms, such as altered target site. A different dicamba‐resistant K. scoparia population was found to have reduced dicamba translocation …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characterization of resistance mechanisms has been investigated in few auxinic herbicide-resistant weeds. Differential absorption, translocation, or metabolism were not the basis for resistance in the majority of the assessed species [11][12][13][14][15]. Only in a few weeds these non-target-site mechanisms (NTSM) have been related with the resistance response [3,16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Only in a few weeds these non-target-site mechanisms (NTSM) have been related with the resistance response [3,16,17]. Additionally, it has been reported that the application of auxinic herbicides stimulates ethylene biosynthesis in sensitive, but not in resistant plants [13,15,18]. This unregulated auxin response and the resulting hyperaccumulation of ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in auxinic herbicide sensitive plants may be involved in the induction of tissue damage and cell death after synthetic auxins application [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism of resistance in most of the auxinic herbicide‐resistant species is not known. Absorption, translocation, root exudation or metabolism were not responsible for auxinic herbicide resistance in several weed biotypes including Centaurea solstitialis L. (Valenzuela‐Valenzuela et al. , 2001), Kochia scoparia L. (Cranston et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the aforementioned auxinic herbicide‐resistant biotypes, the mechanism of resistances is hypothesized to be due to altered auxin binding to the target site or altered signal transduction along the auxin pathway (Penuik et al. , 1993; Valenzuela‐Valenzuela et al. , 2001, 2002; Goss & Dyer, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%