Cloning comeback

Cyranoski, David

doi:10.1038/505468a

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Research misconduct makes the headlines of academic journals (Cyranoski, 2014; Kennedy, 2002). Research integrity and misconduct are important to all stakeholders within and outside science.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Heterogeneity in European Research Integrity Guidance

Godecharle

Nemery

Dierickx

2014

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Similar forms of misconduct are perceived differently throughout Europe. There are no extensive surveys on the guidance on research integrity in the different countries of Europe. Therefore, we performed a systematic content analysis of (biomedical) research integrity guidance documents from all the countries of the European Economic Area. We show that there is strong heterogeneity concerning research integrity guidance on crucial aspects, for example, the defining of research misconduct, at both an international and a national level. We also sought to explain why the guidance documents differ by distinguishing the approaches that underlie them. We distinguished a value-based and a norm-based approach, as well as different perspectives on trust. The current confusing situation concerning research integrity guidance hampers international research and possibly wastes research funds. We risk talking past each other, if we do not take the distinction between these underlying approaches into account.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Heterogeneity in European Research Integrity Guidance

Godecharle

Nemery

Dierickx

2014

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Later that year, he went further with the birth of the world's first cloned dog. The hype surrounding these breakthroughs was intense, but everything began to unravel when a series of ethical and scientific irregularities emerged, leading to serious questioning of the validity of the isolation of human ESCs (Cyranoski 2004(Cyranoski , 2014. It was only far more recently, in 2013, that the production of patientspecific ESCs through cloning has been unequivocally accomplished (Tachibana et al 2013).…”

Section: Public Face Of Escsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spirituality

Becker

2016

Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to recents tudies, the number of scientists doing bad science is tremendously high. [12] Whati ss cientific misconduct?A bove all, it is fabrication, falsification,a nd unauthorised copying (plagiarism) of data andt ext-the so-called FFP categories.S ome cases like that of Korean geneticist and biochemist Hwang Woo-Seok, [13] who fabricated an enormous amount of data in order to keep the illusion of the correctness of his revolutionaryresearch alive, are obvious and clear in ethical evaluation. [14] However,t here is av ery large grey zone!…”

Section: Good Scientific Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

The Ethical and Social Dimensions of Chemistry: Reflections, Considerations, and Clarifications

Mehlich

Moser²,

Tiggelen

et al. 2017

Chemistry A European J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

"Ethics in Chemistry" is ah uge topic with various viewpoints and arguments on what it actually is and what compliance to ethical guidelines and participation in ethical discourse imply,c overing principles of science and research ethics,p rofessione thics, and technology ethics. Overview and clarity are lost easily.T he authors-members of the recently formed EuCheMS working party "Ethics in Chemistry"-present an attemptt oc ollect and sort the ethically relevant aspects and challenges that chemists see themselves confronted with. Based on this list, strategies for ethical action are outlined. On the one hand, there are those issues that are am atter of compliance to existing guidelines and standards. On the other hand, there are those conflicts that arise at the intersection of science, technology and societya nd that need engaged chemists participating in the larger discourse for sustainability.T hisE ditorial attempts to pointo ut why this is important and what chemists can do in particular.

show abstract

Cloning comeback

Cited by 9 publications

References 11 publications

Heterogeneity in European Research Integrity Guidance

Heterogeneity in European Research Integrity Guidance

Spirituality

The Ethical and Social Dimensions of Chemistry: Reflections, Considerations, and Clarifications

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About