1995
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.270.10.5490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloning and Expression of a Receptor for an Insecticidal Toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis

Abstract: Environmentally friendly toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis are effective in controlling agriculturally and biomedically harmful insects. However, little is known about the insect receptor molecules that bind these toxins and the mechanism of insecticidal activity. We report here for the first time the cloning and expression of a cDNA that encodes a receptor (BT-R1) of the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta for an insecticidal toxin of B. thuringiensis. The receptor is a 210-kDa membrane glycoprotein that specifical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
251
1
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 326 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
251
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…31,50 BT-R 1 homologs are the principal determinant for Cry1A toxin action in lepidopteran insects. [30][31][32][33][34][35] No BT-R 1 homologs has been identified in vertebrates, suggesting that these particular cadherin receptors represent a unique family of proteins in invertebrates, particularly insects, and may explain why Cry toxins are not toxic to mammalian cells. Perhaps, Cry toxins once constituted virulence factors with the ability to destroy cells through oligomerization and incorporation of toxin molecules into cell membranes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…31,50 BT-R 1 homologs are the principal determinant for Cry1A toxin action in lepidopteran insects. [30][31][32][33][34][35] No BT-R 1 homologs has been identified in vertebrates, suggesting that these particular cadherin receptors represent a unique family of proteins in invertebrates, particularly insects, and may explain why Cry toxins are not toxic to mammalian cells. Perhaps, Cry toxins once constituted virulence factors with the ability to destroy cells through oligomerization and incorporation of toxin molecules into cell membranes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cadherin receptor BT-R 1 , identified in the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta, [30][31][32] represents a family of cadherins that are expressed in the midgut epithelium of various insects susceptible to Cry1A toxins. Cry toxins bind to their respective cadherin receptors with high affinity and specificity, the disruption or absence of which results in loss of susceptibility to Cry toxin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of Cry1A toxins, two receptors have been characterized in several lepidopteran species, cadherin-like proteins, (named Bt-R 1 in the case of M. sexta) [42], and the GPI-anchored proteins aminopeptidase-N (APN) and alkaline phosphatase [22,25].…”
Section: Models Of the Mode Of Action Of Cry Toxins In Lepidopteran Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even more, the principal mechanism of resistance to Cry toxins are mutations that affect toxin-receptor interaction [8]. Different proteins such as cadherins, aminopeptidase-N (APN), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) have been characterized as Cry-receptors in different insect species [17,18,21,33]. Thus, understanding the molecular basis of the interaction of Cry toxins with their receptor molecules would be useful not only for engineering Cry proteins with different specificities or with enhanced insecticidal activity but also for coping with the problem of insect resistance in the field.…”
Section: Bt Cry Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At that time, two M. sexta proteins that bind Cry1A toxins had been cloned and characterized, a 210 kDa cadherin protein known as Bt-R 1 and a 120 kDa glycosylphosphatidy-linositol (GPI) anchored aminopeptidase N (APN) [21,33]. As a way to determine which was the functional receptor and the amino acid epitopes involved in the toxinreceptor interaction, we decided to select by phage display peptides that bind Cry1Ab toxin and identify those that competed toxin interaction with both receptor molecules, then we used these phages as tools to determine the role of both M. sexta proteins in toxicity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%