2014
DOI: 10.1515/sg-2014-0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clonal Variation of Eucalypts in Susceptibility to Bacterial Wilt Detected by Using Different Inoculation Methods

Abstract: Summary Four inoculation methods were investigated for assessing the clonal variation of eucalypts in susceptibility to bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum). The results showed that these inoculation methods obviously differed in the disease infection process, clonal variation and clonal mean repeatability in susceptibility of stock materials inoculated. For each inoculation method, the clonal effect was consistently significant over the assessment period. Root-collar suspension injection method (RSI) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An essential requirement for a screening program is a reliable and reproducible inoculation method. In the case of Ralstonia species, artificial inoculations on Eucalyptus are rarely successful, i.e., inoculations either fail or inconsistent results are obtained ( Cruz and Dianese, 1986 ; Dianese et al, 1990 ; Dianese and Dristig, 1993 ; Coutinho et al, 2000 ; Wei et al, 2014 ). Fonseca et al (2016) described what they termed an “efficient method” to test for resistance of Eucalyptus to R. solanacearum but when attempted elsewhere ( Carstensen et al, 2017 ), the method failed to produce symptoms in a susceptible clone.…”
Section: Susceptibility Of Eucalyptusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An essential requirement for a screening program is a reliable and reproducible inoculation method. In the case of Ralstonia species, artificial inoculations on Eucalyptus are rarely successful, i.e., inoculations either fail or inconsistent results are obtained ( Cruz and Dianese, 1986 ; Dianese et al, 1990 ; Dianese and Dristig, 1993 ; Coutinho et al, 2000 ; Wei et al, 2014 ). Fonseca et al (2016) described what they termed an “efficient method” to test for resistance of Eucalyptus to R. solanacearum but when attempted elsewhere ( Carstensen et al, 2017 ), the method failed to produce symptoms in a susceptible clone.…”
Section: Susceptibility Of Eucalyptusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides signi cant economic losses that might arise from plant mortality in the nursery, those asymptomatic mini-cuttings may also face stressful conditions in the eld and eventually express the disease symptoms (Coutinho and Wing eld 2017). Nevertheless, differences in the susceptibility of eucalyptus clones to Ralstonia species has been demonstrated previously (Wu and Liang 1988;Dianese et al 1990;Gan et al 2004;Wang et al 2011;Wei et al 2014;Fonseca et al 2016), representing an additional alternative on managing bacterial wilt. Resistance to bacterial wilt is a highly desirable trait not always readily available in the breeding population but may be introduced via controlled crosses followed by screening for resistant genotypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Liang 1988;Dianese et al 1990;Gan et al 2004;Wang et al 2011;Wei et al 2014;Fonseca et al 2016). Screening for disease resistance is particularly di cult for the pathosystem Rasltonia × Eucalyptus due to inconsistent reproducibility of symptoms even under controlled conditions, however, e cient inoculation methods have been studied previously and provided reliable protocols(Wei et al 2014;Fonseca et al 2016). In our study, the inoculation protocol was successfully implemented and helped to properly screen eucalyptus genotypes for resistance to bacterial wilt.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%