2016
DOI: 10.37236/5715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cliques in Graphs Excluding a Complete Graph Minor

Abstract: This paper considers the following question: What is the maximum number of $k$-cliques in an $n$-vertex graph with no $K_t$-minor? This question generalises the extremal function for $K_t$-minors, which corresponds to the $k=2$ case. The exact answer is given for $t\leq 9$ and all values of $k$. We also determine the maximum total number of cliques in an $n$-vertex graph with no $K_t$-minor for $t\leq 9$. Several observations are made about the case of general $t$.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some sense, degeneracy is equivalent with "sparsity." For example, the number of cliques in every r-degenerate graph is at most a linear number of its vertices [50]. On the other hand, a graph is not r-degenerate if and only if it contains a subgraph of minimum degree at least r + 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some sense, degeneracy is equivalent with "sparsity." For example, the number of cliques in every r-degenerate graph is at most a linear number of its vertices [50]. On the other hand, a graph is not r-degenerate if and only if it contains a subgraph of minimum degree at least r + 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average size of the cliques in the complement of a perfect matching of size x is 2x/3, and a random clique in this graph typically has about this size. Thus, for k = 4t/9, the graph which is a complement of a perfect matching of size just less than 2t/3 is K t -minor free and has nearly the maximum number of K k , namely 3 2t/3−o(t) n. For k = t − 1 and n ≥ t − 1, Wood [18] shows that the maximum number of K k is n − t + 2. We therefore see that depending on the range of k, the answer has quite different forms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We determined the number of cliques in a graph on n vertices with no K t -minor up to a factor 2 o(t) . It would be interesting to determine the exact value, as has been done by Wood [18] for t ≤ 9. As observed by Wood, for small values of t, the extremal example is a graph formed from a K t−2 by adding vertices one at a time whose neighorhood in the graph so far is a K t−2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a consequence, H is dek -degenerate. It is a folklore result that -degenerate graphs on n vertices have at most t−1 n cliques of size t (see for instance [28,Lemma 18], where the proof gives a linear time algorithm to enumerate all the cliques of size t when t and are fixed), and hence there are at most…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%