2018
DOI: 10.1101/401604
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CLIP-Seq and massively parallel functional analysis of the CELF6 RNA binding protein reveals a role in destabilizing synaptic gene mRNAs through interaction with 3’UTR elements in vivo

Abstract: CELF6 is an RNA-binding protein in a family of proteins with roles in human health and disease, however little is known about the mRNA targets or in vivo function of this protein.We utilized HITS-CLIP/CLIP-Seq to identify, for the first time, in vivo targets of CELF6 and identify hundreds of transcripts bound by CELF6 in the brain. We found these are disproportionately mRNAs coding for synaptic proteins. We then conducted extensive functional validation of these targets, testing greater than 400 CELF6 bound se… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, there could be a more non-specific mechanism where a variety of RBPs have redundant roles and work in a larger ensemble. For example, the set of RBPs identified as enriched in the upregulated transcripts is remarkably similar to the motifs found in our recent study of Celf6 binding targets (Rieger et al, 2018), even though the actual transcripts are distinct. As Celf6 and related Celf proteins have a role in forming RNA granules for mRNA storage and/or decay, and these granules often contain numerous species of RBPs and mRNAs interacting non-specifically through phase separation mediated by disordered domains, this suggests that transcripts enriched in binding for this selection of proteins may be more likely sequestered into a common granule awaiting some kind of signal for release and translation following neuronal activation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…On the other hand, there could be a more non-specific mechanism where a variety of RBPs have redundant roles and work in a larger ensemble. For example, the set of RBPs identified as enriched in the upregulated transcripts is remarkably similar to the motifs found in our recent study of Celf6 binding targets (Rieger et al, 2018), even though the actual transcripts are distinct. As Celf6 and related Celf proteins have a role in forming RNA granules for mRNA storage and/or decay, and these granules often contain numerous species of RBPs and mRNAs interacting non-specifically through phase separation mediated by disordered domains, this suggests that transcripts enriched in binding for this selection of proteins may be more likely sequestered into a common granule awaiting some kind of signal for release and translation following neuronal activation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Much has been performed in this regard with FMRP, both through CLIP 51 and loss of function studies. 53 In contrast, the molecular targets of Celf6 are just now being studied, 54 and its molecular function is beginning to be elucidated. 5 Agents that decrease mGluR5 activity and its downstream signaling have rescued FXS-related phenotypes in Fmr1-deficient mouse models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the receptor signaling pathways that influence FMRP activity at the synapse, which in turn are dysregulated in the absence of FMRP, have been identified and pharmacologically targeted, such as NMDA, AMPA, BNDF and mTOR. 53 In contrast, the molecular targets of Celf6 are just now being studied, 54 and its molecular function is beginning to be elucidated. In in vitro assays it has been shown to have some activity as a splicing factor, 55 but localization in the central nervous system includes predominant cytoplasmic labeling, 4 consistent with non-nuclear roles in regulating RNA stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPRAs quantify activity of putative regulatory elements by coupling them to a reporter gene and counting transcribed, element-specific tags ("barcodes"), using sequencing to determine the ratio of (expressed RNA barcode)/(delivered DNA barcode). This experimental framework has been applied to human splicing (21)(22)(23), RNA editing (24), protein translation (25), UTRs (26)(27)(28)(29)(30), and, most broadly, transcriptional (i.e., cis-) regulators. MPRAs thus offer a flexible framework to study regulatory phenomenon, including transcription factor (TF) and RNA binding protein (RBP) actions, transcript stability, and ribosome occupancy.…”
Section: Part 1: Mpras For Identification Of Sequence Variants With Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 1C and 1D, the same architecture and RNA/DNA expression metric can be used to assess UTR effects on transcript stability. UTR MPRAs have yet to be implemented to study regulatory variants directly, but have been used to study the regulatory grammar of the ASD/ID-implicated CELF proteins and related RBPs (26,50,51), features conferring transcript stability via 3'UTRs (27,28,30), and 5'UTR influences on translation (52) and prediction of functional 5'UTR variants (29). Across enhancer and UTR MPRAs, several key forms of disease-associated noncoding variation can be assessed for functional consequences using a variety of model systems and delivery approaches (Figure 1E-F).…”
Section: Part 1: Mpras For Identification Of Sequence Variants With Fmentioning
confidence: 99%