2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinimetric properties of the Smoking Abstinence Expectancies Questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion of biochemical verification in clinical research design can greatly improve the quality of the study [ 48 ]. However, only using patient-reported outcome or/(and) biochemical verification to evaluate the physiological changes of smokers, there is a certain level of limitation in the adoption of outcome indicators and the choice of evaluation methods, and the lack of observation of the psychological and behavioral changes of smokers, such as the change in smoking abstinence expectancies [ 49 ], motivation to quit smoking, the number of attempts to quit smoking and the degree of nicotine dependence, can be used as secondary outcome indicators of smoking cessation intervention. These data can also provide clues for improving smoking cessation interventions [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inclusion of biochemical verification in clinical research design can greatly improve the quality of the study [ 48 ]. However, only using patient-reported outcome or/(and) biochemical verification to evaluate the physiological changes of smokers, there is a certain level of limitation in the adoption of outcome indicators and the choice of evaluation methods, and the lack of observation of the psychological and behavioral changes of smokers, such as the change in smoking abstinence expectancies [ 49 ], motivation to quit smoking, the number of attempts to quit smoking and the degree of nicotine dependence, can be used as secondary outcome indicators of smoking cessation intervention. These data can also provide clues for improving smoking cessation interventions [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research should focus on improving the methodological quality of the trial, shortening the intervention period, and exploring more outcomes. Further studies should consider both the negative and positive influence of the low dose computed tomography screening population and report the test according to CONSORT guidelines; additionally, future research can also evaluate the smoking cessation effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions by observing changes in end points such as Fagestrom test, pack years, eCO, and spirometry; the smoking abstinence expectancies questionnaire (SAEQ) can be used to evaluate smoking abstinence expectancies [ 49 ]. This would help to explore smoking cessation interventions more comprehensively to provide scientific evidence of smoking cessation methods for long-term smokers at high risk of lung cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are in line with theoretical models of smoking–anxiety interplay [ 76 ] and related research among Latinx smoking samples [ 32 ] that suggests anxiety-related states may be involved in biased smoking beliefs centered on mood and bodily regulation. The group differences for clinical anxiety (versus not) are likely to be clinically important given abstinence expectancies are often related to less quit success and higher degrees of tobacco withdrawal and craving [ 39 , 77 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterward, to facilitate the use of the DASS in time-constrained settings, a shorter 21-item version (i.e., DASS-21) was developed [23,24]. The DASS-21 has shown favorable psychometric and clinimetric properties; due to its short format, ease of administration, and availability in the public domain, it has become one of the most widely employed selfreport instruments in research and clinical practice [25,26]. Notably, recent research has demonstrated its robust reliability and validity in specific populations, including primary and middle school teachers [27], undergraduate nursing students [28], frontline doctors [29], and caregivers of young children [30], thus substantiating its usability across various contexts.…”
Section: The Assessment Of Anxiety and Depression Through The Depress...mentioning
confidence: 99%