2018
DOI: 10.3171/2017.5.jns17905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinicoradiological features of intraneural perineuriomas obviate the need for tissue diagnosis

Abstract: This study identified clinical and radiological features that are associated with a diagnosis of perineurioma. The Perineurioma Diagnostic Criteria were determined to be the following: 1) no cancer history, 2) unifocal disease, 3) moderate to severe hyperintensity on T2-weighted MR images, 4) moderate to severe contrast enhancement, 5) homogeneous contrast enhancement, 6) fusiform shape, 7) enlargement of the involved nerves, and 8) age ≤ 40 years. Use of the Perineurioma Diagnostic Criteria obviates the need … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 In addition, Wilson et al developed the following Perineurioma Diagnostic Criteria: no cancer history, unifocal disease, moderate to severe hyperintensity on T2-weighted MR images, moderate to severe contrast enhancement, homogeneous contrast enhancement, fusiform shape, enlargement of the involved nerves, and age 40 years. 9 Therefore, in their opinion, biopsy samples are not necessary. Based on our experience, there are rare cases (see Illustrative Cases a and b), such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) 6 in which MRI findings are similar to perineurioma, but their treatment differs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In addition, Wilson et al developed the following Perineurioma Diagnostic Criteria: no cancer history, unifocal disease, moderate to severe hyperintensity on T2-weighted MR images, moderate to severe contrast enhancement, homogeneous contrast enhancement, fusiform shape, enlargement of the involved nerves, and age 40 years. 9 Therefore, in their opinion, biopsy samples are not necessary. Based on our experience, there are rare cases (see Illustrative Cases a and b), such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) 6 in which MRI findings are similar to perineurioma, but their treatment differs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On MRI, PNs typically present as a fusiform enlargement of the nerve fascicles, isointense on T1-weighted and moderate to strong hyperintensity on T2-weighted MR images with moderate to strong homogenous contrast enhancement after intravenous gandolinium application [9,32]. On HRNS examinations, a nerve enlargement over several centimetres with hyperechoic perineurial tissue can be detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), sparing the patient of the risk and costs of these medications. Based on our extensive experience with these conditions and the lessons we have learned from common clinicoradiologic features, we do not biopsy "routine" cases of CIDP (Amrami et al, 2010;Pinto et al, 2019), intraneural perineuriomas (Wilson et al, 2018a), or nerve hamartomas/choristomas (see below).…”
Section: "Tissue Is the Issue"mentioning
confidence: 99%