2015
DOI: 10.4103/2278-0513.152735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinicopathologic significance of Papanicolaou smear study of postmenopausal women in a rural tertiary care center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rajput et al [2] also found a high SIL rate in rural women (10.5%). High SIL incidence rates of 11 and 17% were also reported by Ambedkar et al [3] and Srivastava et al [4], respectively, in rural screenings. A moderate incidence of SIL ranging from 6.4 to 7.1% was reported in rural women by Das Gupta et al [5] and Deodhar et al [6, 7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rajput et al [2] also found a high SIL rate in rural women (10.5%). High SIL incidence rates of 11 and 17% were also reported by Ambedkar et al [3] and Srivastava et al [4], respectively, in rural screenings. A moderate incidence of SIL ranging from 6.4 to 7.1% was reported in rural women by Das Gupta et al [5] and Deodhar et al [6, 7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This might be due to shyness factor prevalent among rural women who are mostly reluctant to disclose their gynaecological complaints. However, Ambedkar et al [3] found a 2-fold higher number of precancerous lesions in symptomatic women compared to asymptomatic cases. Bukhari and Saba [17] also reported similar findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%