2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinicopathologic Features of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring the EML4-ALK Fusion Gene: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: BackgroundThe frequencies of EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with different clinicopathologic features described by previous studies are inconsistent. The key demographic and pathologic features associated with EML4-ALK fusion gene have not been definitively established. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the frequency of the EML4-ALK fusion gene in patients with different clinicopathologic features and to identify an enriched population of patients with NSCLC harboring EML4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A revision of the literature on FISH/IHC analysis-discordant cases, including our series (reported in Table 4) indicates a response rate of 100% and 46% for IHC analysis-positive (the Ventana test)/ FISH-negative and IHC analysis-negative (all tests)/ FISH-positive patients, respectively. 4,7,10,20,21,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] These data indicate the important role of IHC analysis in the selection of patients for anti-ALK treatment. 31 To ensure that no ALK-positive patients are left behind, however, it would be desirable to carry out IHC and FISH analysis in all cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A revision of the literature on FISH/IHC analysis-discordant cases, including our series (reported in Table 4) indicates a response rate of 100% and 46% for IHC analysis-positive (the Ventana test)/ FISH-negative and IHC analysis-negative (all tests)/ FISH-positive patients, respectively. 4,7,10,20,21,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] These data indicate the important role of IHC analysis in the selection of patients for anti-ALK treatment. 31 To ensure that no ALK-positive patients are left behind, however, it would be desirable to carry out IHC and FISH analysis in all cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…25 These data are concordant with the results of a meta-analysis conducted by Wang et al in which only 0.75% of patients (three of 399) with EGFR mutations also harbored ALK rearrangement. 26 However, numerous clinical cases (n ¼ 43) have been reported and collected in a recent review of case series, leading to the conclusion of a 1.5% prevalence for ALK rearrangement in patients with EGFR mutation. 27 In addition, Rosell et al reported on a population of 95 EGFR-mutated adenocarcinomas (EURTAC trial), with a 15.8% prevalence of concomitant ALK rearrangement, although this result was probably accounted for by the low specificity of the polymerase chain reaction assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pathway serves as a target for small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as erlotinib and osimertinib, which have become first-line treatment options for EGFR mutant NSCLC (15). Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) oncogene related translocations also occur more frequently in female NSCLC patients, presenting another welldefined drug target to clinicians (16,17). Likewise, the rare ROS1 rearrangements are also more common in lung ACs from women than men (18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Sex Differences In Nsclc Incidence Presentation and Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%