2019
DOI: 10.1370/afm.2383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinicians’ Overestimation of Their Geographic Service Area

Abstract: In this study, we evaluated family physicians' ability to estimate the service area of their patient panel-a critical first step in contextual population-based primary care. We surveyed 14 clinicians and administrators from 6 practices. Participants circled their estimated service area on county maps that were compared with the actual service area containing 70% of the practice's patients. Accuracy was ascertained from overlap and the amount of estimated census tracts that were not part of the actual service a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And once again, this likely requires explicit training and experience in engagement and advocacy, as well as datadriven understanding of panel size, community and service area characteristics unfamiliar to most current FPs. 53,75 This concept of adapting to local need is of particular importance to the family medicine GME enterprise, whose small, widely distributed, and largely community-based training sites yield graduates particularly likely to practice within 100 miles of GME training. 76…”
Section: Tailoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And once again, this likely requires explicit training and experience in engagement and advocacy, as well as datadriven understanding of panel size, community and service area characteristics unfamiliar to most current FPs. 53,75 This concept of adapting to local need is of particular importance to the family medicine GME enterprise, whose small, widely distributed, and largely community-based training sites yield graduates particularly likely to practice within 100 miles of GME training. 76…”
Section: Tailoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 This approach has proven difficult to implement for several reasons, including problems with defining "community." Rock and colleagues 21 tested the relationship between actual and clinician-predicted geographic service area and found vast discrepancy. They conclude that "practices need tools to better understand the communities they serve before they can be expected to undertake population-level interventions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%