2021
DOI: 10.1161/jaha.120.019706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinicians for CARE: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Interventions to Support Caregivers of Patients With Heart Disease

Abstract: Background Caregivers provide critical support for patients with chronic diseases, including heart disease, but often experience caregiver stress that negatively impacts their health, quality of life, and patient outcomes. We aimed to inform health care teams on an evidence‐based approach to supporting the caregivers of patients with heart disease. Methods and Results We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials wri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major types of interventions for caregiving burden include psychoeducation for patients and family members to build knowledge and skills to cope with CVD care and counseling sessions to mitigate their psychological stress. 37 Although…”
Section: Jama Network Open | Cardiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major types of interventions for caregiving burden include psychoeducation for patients and family members to build knowledge and skills to cope with CVD care and counseling sessions to mitigate their psychological stress. 37 Although…”
Section: Jama Network Open | Cardiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most trials were focused on helping caregivers support the self-care needs of patients (patient-targeted), such as by providing educational sessions to increase caregiver involvement in medication adherence and symptom monitoring. There was little support for the personal wellbeing of the caregiver and interventions had limited impact on caregiver-specific outcomes such as caregiver burden or depression (Buck et al, 2015; Dunbar et al, 2008; Kitko et al, 2020; Knowles et al, 2021; Nicholas Dionne-Odom et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Promoting caregiver recognition of their own needs and addressing their own self-care needs is a priority recommendation for caregiving research [ 1 , 13 ]. Most caregiving interventions focus on reducing burden through psychoeducational programs related to patient care, but few focus on encouraging self-care behaviors of the caregiver to promote their own health and well-being [ 14 ]. Flipping the paradigm of caregiver intervention away from a burden focus towards a strengths focus can highlight and develop caregivers’ existing strengths, build new strengths, decrease stressors, and improve resilience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%