Abstract:This report highlights gaps in access to vaccines recommended for adults across the spectrum of provider specialties. Greater implementation of the Standards by all providers could improve adult vaccination rates in the U.S. by reducing missed opportunities to recommend vaccinations and either vaccinate or refer patients to vaccine providers.
“…The completion rate for the pharmacist survey was 89.1% (261 completed out of 293 that began the survey). Additional details on the survey methodology are available elsewhere [33].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses were conducted from March to August 2017. To produce estimates more reflective of the national clinician and pharmacist populations, each sample was balance-weighted using a raking calibration procedure that aligned the responding sample to national benchmarks for respondents’ age, sex, race/ethnicity, occupation, work setting, and Census region as described elsewhere [33]. All survey estimates were computed using these final weights.…”
Although many clinicians and pharmacists reported implementing most of the individual components of the Standards, with the exception of IIS use, there are discrepancies in providers' reported actual practices and their beliefs/perceptions, and barriers to vaccinating adults remain.
“…The completion rate for the pharmacist survey was 89.1% (261 completed out of 293 that began the survey). Additional details on the survey methodology are available elsewhere [33].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses were conducted from March to August 2017. To produce estimates more reflective of the national clinician and pharmacist populations, each sample was balance-weighted using a raking calibration procedure that aligned the responding sample to national benchmarks for respondents’ age, sex, race/ethnicity, occupation, work setting, and Census region as described elsewhere [33]. All survey estimates were computed using these final weights.…”
Although many clinicians and pharmacists reported implementing most of the individual components of the Standards, with the exception of IIS use, there are discrepancies in providers' reported actual practices and their beliefs/perceptions, and barriers to vaccinating adults remain.
“…Providers in that setting provided a range of feedback including ‘if the [CDS alerts] are going to help me do my job, [it] should be welcomed’ to ‘they are often incorrect.’ 18 Despite vaccine recommendations in the provider setting, a 2018 study showed that providers assessed and recommended vaccines based on the ACIP immunization schedules, but often did not stock vaccines such as HPV, PCV13, and ZVL as readily as the community pharmacy. 19 Many studies have shown success with vaccine programs in the community pharmacy setting, but the patients were screened using paper forms instead of electronic CDS alerts. 20–22…”
Objective:
Our study compared the completeness of immunization records for six vaccines between a community pharmacy database, regional immunization information system (IIS), and a health system’s electronic health record (EHR).
Methods:
In a community pharmacy immunization program, two pharmacists and a community pharmacy resident performed a needs assessment for six vaccines (tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine for adults or diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine for child and adolescents, zoster vaccine live, 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine, hepatitis B vaccine series, and human papillomavirus vaccine) for over 2,400 patients between August 2016 and March 2017. This is a retrospective study to review immunization records for 243 patients. Inclusion criteria included patients from the community pharmacy immunization program who also had at least one medication prescribed by an academic health system provider. Immunization records for six vaccines were collected from the community pharmacy database, regional IIS, and EHR.
Results:
186 of 243 (77%) patients had additional immunization records in the regional IIS or EHR that were not found in the community pharmacy database. For those 186 patients, 108 (58%) patients had additional immunization records for 2 or more unique vaccines. In total, 378 additional immunization records were identified for the six vaccines. For all six vaccines, the regional IIS and EHR possessed more complete immunization records compared to the community pharmacy database (p < 0.05 for HPV and p < 0.001 for the remaining 5 vaccines).
Conclusion:
Our study showed that immunization records were more complete in a regional IIS and health system EHR compared to a community pharmacy database. If all three sources were utilized by the pharmacist during the needs assessment, the community pharmacy team would have made fewer vaccine recommendations, which would have reduced the potential for duplicate or inappropriate vaccines.
“…Other recent work assessing clinicians' implementation of the NVAC Adult Immunization Standards reported much higher assessment rates of adult patients' needs by pharmacists ( 84%) and internal and family medicine physicians ( 89%) for influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations. 32,33 However, those findings used a convenience sample comprising a more disparate and smaller set of pharmacists (n ¼ 261), with different survey questions. Such high levels of compliance should be interpreted with caution given pervasive low immunization rates and high unmet needs.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.