Clinician‐Patient Small Talk: Comparing Fourth‐Year Dental Students and Practicing Dentists in a Standardized Patient Encounter

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish whether frequency of non-diagnostic, non-management exchanges between clinicians and patient (called "socioemotional communication," SC) during a consultation differed between fourth-year dental students and dentists, controlling for clinically driven exchanges of information. Fifteen dentists and 17 fourth-year dental students were recorded in 2006 while undergoing a consultation with a live standardized patient and were subsequently interviewed by investigators in a separate room with the recording present for analysis. Their shared interpretations of cognitive strategies were recorded and compared for differences in the presence of SC. The results showed that most of the students and dentists engaged in SC throughout the consultation with a few exceptions. There were no significant differences between student and dentist cohorts for overall SC presence (p=0.62), time to first instance of SC from overall start of the consultation (p=0.73), and time to first instance of SC after first intraoral examination had taken place (p=0.76). Nonsignificant differences were also recorded for overall frequency at which SC occurred from overall start of the consultation (p=0.89) and after the first intraoral examination had taken place (p=0.12). The patterns showed SC interaction occurring throughout the consultation, not concentrated at the beginning or end. SC did not appear to differ between practitioners and students in terms of prevalence, frequency, or timing. Future research should examine the detailed association between SC and diagnostic thinking processes to further delineate the relationship and characterize possible pedagogical applications.Dr. Maupome is Professor,

Patient-Provider Communication Training Models for Interactive Speech Devices

“…Another aspect for us to consider are some of the "trivial" social exchanges that sometimes occur between provider and patient. For example, small talk, or similar social emotional exchanges, is not uncommon to occur between the patient and the provider which has been cited to have some benefits in improving the relationship between them [72]. The dialogue scripts did contain minor small talk (e.g., parking issues by the patient), and our model did not include these types of interactions.…”

Implementing Standardized Patient Caregivers to Practice Difficult Conversations in a Pediatric Dentistry Course

“…28,29 Since then, dental schools have implemented SP encounters in the predoctoral curriculum, mostly with adult patients or interprofessional teams. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36] As an introduction to simulation, SP encounters can be utilized in dental education to help students practice patient interviewing and history taking, creating and delivering dental treatment plans, obtaining informed consent, and having difficult conversations about controversial topics such as the use of fluoride, dental materials, or radiography. Much as in other health care fields, current research on SP encounters in dentistry suggests the methodology is a valuable part of dental education, improving provider communication, confidence, and conflict resolution skills.…”