2016
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical value of jointly detection serum lactate dehydrogenase/pleural fluid adenosine deaminase and pleural fluid carcinoembryonic antigen in the identification of malignant pleural effusion

Abstract: Joint detection of sLDH/pADA and pCEA can be used as a good indicator for the identification of benign and MPE with higher sensitivity and specificity than pCEA or sLDH/pADA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pan et al [ 36 ] found that levels of effusion CEA were significantly higher in patients with MPE than that in BPE patients and thus effusion ECA was incorporated into the predictive model. Furthermore, a clinical study conducted by Zhang et al [ 37 ] revealed that effusion CEA could be served as a promising indicator for the discrimination of MPE and with favorable diagnostic performance as reflected by an AUC of 0.924. Our study showed that effusion CEA was the most informative parameter in the deep learning and machine learning models, indicating the significant role of effusion CEA in the differential diagnosis of MPE and BPE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pan et al [ 36 ] found that levels of effusion CEA were significantly higher in patients with MPE than that in BPE patients and thus effusion ECA was incorporated into the predictive model. Furthermore, a clinical study conducted by Zhang et al [ 37 ] revealed that effusion CEA could be served as a promising indicator for the discrimination of MPE and with favorable diagnostic performance as reflected by an AUC of 0.924. Our study showed that effusion CEA was the most informative parameter in the deep learning and machine learning models, indicating the significant role of effusion CEA in the differential diagnosis of MPE and BPE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed a meta-analysis of 7 studies (including the present one) involving 860 patients with MPE and 1,218 patients with BPE [18,[22][23][24][25][26]. These studies were published from 2016 to present, across five countries, three in China, two in Singapore, one in Egypt, and one in Poland.…”
Section: Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the gold standard of MPE diagnosis is cytopathology, occasionally, several sampling times were required for identification of malignant cancer cells with microscopy. Various markers have been suggested as noninvasive tests to help discriminate between BPE and MPE and to provide prognostic information . The most heavily studied diagnostic biomarker in pleural effusion is carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various markers have been suggested as noninvasive tests to help discriminate between BPE and MPE and to provide prognostic information. 16,17 The most heavily studied diagnostic biomarker in pleural effusion is carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). A meta-analysis including 49 studies suggested that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of pleural effusion CEA for diagnosing MPE were 0.549 and 0.962.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%