2009
DOI: 10.1097/jto.0b013e3181c0a7ff
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Value of Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Differentiation of Malignant Mesothelioma from Asbestos-Related Benign Pleural Disease: An Observational Pilot Study

Abstract: Preliminary results of this trial provide evidence that 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging is a highly accurate and reliable noninvasive test to decide for further investigation of differentiating malignant mesothelioma from benign pleural disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This places PET-CT in a favorable light and the utility of this is supported by its increasing use in MPM. It can play a role in differentiating benign from malignant lesions and help target the most suitable lesion for biopsy (10). In addition, it has been shown to be effective in pre-operative imaging, particularly with regards to detecting distant metastases (11,12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This places PET-CT in a favorable light and the utility of this is supported by its increasing use in MPM. It can play a role in differentiating benign from malignant lesions and help target the most suitable lesion for biopsy (10). In addition, it has been shown to be effective in pre-operative imaging, particularly with regards to detecting distant metastases (11,12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study found that PET scanning sensitivity was 96.8% and specificity was 88.5% in distinguishing benign from malignant pleural disease (Duysinx et al, 2004). Additionally, another study showed that a cut-off value of 2.2 for SUV provided the best accuracy, with 94.1% and 100% for sensitivity and specificity (Yildirim et al, 2009). Furthermore, the usefulness of dual time point FDG-PET imaging in distinguishing malignant from benign localizing pleural disease has been reported (Mavi et al, 2009).…”
Section: Differentiating Malignant From Benign Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recently reported study [7], 31 consecutive patients (17 with MPM, nine with benign asbestos-related pleural disease and nine with diffuse pleural fibrosis), underwent FDG-PET/CT to study its utility to differentiate various pathologies. FDG-PET/CT correctly detected the presence of malignancy in 15 of the 17 patients with MPM for a sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of 88.2%, 92.9%, and 90.3%, respectively.…”
Section: Pet/ct In Differentiation Of Mpm From Benign Pleural Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%