2013
DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0b013e3182550d9d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Value of Circulating Lipocalins and Insulin-Like Growth Factor Axis in Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis

Abstract: Retinol binding protein 4, NGAL, IGF-I, and IGFBP-3 are associated with PC in type 2 diabetic patients. They could be useful in distinguishing PC from non-PC cases when used in combination or with cancer antigen.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were seven nested case-control studies [21,22,29,30,31,32,33,34] and three retrospective case-control studies [23,24,25]. Nine articles described the association between IGF-I concentration and PaC risk [21,22,23,24,25,30,31,32,33], three described the association between IGF-II concentration and PaC risk [22,30,31], six reported the association between IGFBP-3 concentration and PaC risk [21,22,30,31,32,33], while four reported the association between the IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio and PaC risk [21,22,30,32]. The average score for the quality assessment of included studies was 7.9 (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were seven nested case-control studies [21,22,29,30,31,32,33,34] and three retrospective case-control studies [23,24,25]. Nine articles described the association between IGF-I concentration and PaC risk [21,22,23,24,25,30,31,32,33], three described the association between IGF-II concentration and PaC risk [22,30,31], six reported the association between IGFBP-3 concentration and PaC risk [21,22,30,31,32,33], while four reported the association between the IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio and PaC risk [21,22,30,32]. The average score for the quality assessment of included studies was 7.9 (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We transformed the corresponding CIs into the log RRs, using the Greenland formula to calculate the corresponding variances. For studies that lacked estimates, we calculated crude estimates from tabular data [23,24,25]. We pooled these relative risks using a fixed effects model to get a summary relative risk for further meta-analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different growth factors influencing the initiation, progression, and metastasis of gastric cancer, IGF plays a critical role in the stimulation of gastric cancer cell proliferation, survival, angiogenesis, and resistance to apoptosis [41]. Recent studies have shown that elevation of serum IGF-1 increases the risk for developing several types of cancer [41][42][43]. In gastric cancer, aberrant activation of IGF-1 receptor by autocrine/paracrine loops has been suggested because expression of both IGF and its receptor is high in tumor tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously demonstrated for many tumor pancreatic cancer markers, MIC-1 also showed only a modest ability to distinguish between pancreatic cancer and pancreatitis and had a limited value in the early diagnosis of PDAC [66]. A small group of patients with pancreatic cancer and preexisting type 2 diabetes demonstrated significant elevation in the serum levels of retinol binding protein 4 (RBP-4), NGAL (neutrophil gelatinase B-associated lipocalin) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) together with a significant reduction in the level of insulin-like growth factor I binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3); receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that theses markers could distinguish pancreatic cancer from non-pancreatic cancer cases in this study [67]. Furthermore, IGF-1R as well as IGF-1 and IGF-2 were found to be up-regulated in pancreatic cancer [68].…”
Section: Selected Markers For Early Detection Of Pancreatic Cancermentioning
confidence: 86%