2020
DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1806368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical validation of the Russian Matrix test – effect of hearing loss, age, and noise level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It might be determined by the redundancy of speech material in the RuMatrix test in comparison to the monosyllabic test. A high correlation (p < 0.01) between SRT Q and mean PTA 0.5, 1, 2, 4 was observed, which confirms that speech discrimination in quiet depends mainly on the peripheral hearing functioning, as previously shown in other investigations [27,31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It might be determined by the redundancy of speech material in the RuMatrix test in comparison to the monosyllabic test. A high correlation (p < 0.01) between SRT Q and mean PTA 0.5, 1, 2, 4 was observed, which confirms that speech discrimination in quiet depends mainly on the peripheral hearing functioning, as previously shown in other investigations [27,31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In this study, the low MSRS Q (≤60%) was revealed in 53 (33%) of 161 patients due to the evaluation of monosyllabic words' intelligibility. The RuMatrix sentence test in quiet showed the normal range of SRT Q according to the age and hearing thresholds in all 24 patients who underwent this test [27]. It might be determined by the redundancy of speech material in the RuMatrix test in comparison to the monosyllabic test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The possible explanation for this finding is the difference in pure-tone thresholds, which, even with adequately fitted hearing aids, are 10-20 dB lower compared with normal pure-tone thresholds. The high correlation between SRT Q and outcomes of pure-tone audiometry was reported in previous studies [80]. Our findings confirm the existing understanding of the interrelationship between temporal processing and speech intelligibility abilities [67,81,82], which was clearly demonstrated in hearing-impaired preterm children in the present study.…”
Section: Speech Audiometry In Quietsupporting
confidence: 92%