1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01726538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical validation of the Deltatrac monitoring system in mechanically ventilated patients

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate a monitor of pulmonary gas exchange (Deltatrac, Datex) in a clinical setting. Design: After in vitro evaluation, comparison over 2 min between ~rO 2 and VCO2 values measured by the Deltatrac and the Douglas bag technique. Comparisons were also achieved over 8 h periods between the Deltatrac and a system using a mass-spectrometer. Setting: Polyvalent intensive care unit (ICU 15 beds) in a 1200 bed general hospital. Patients: Comparison with the Douglas bag technique in I0 patients undergo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique has been described as the gold standard in indirect calorimetry and has been validated in the measurement of RMR in both adults and children (Weissman et al 1990;Tissot et al 1995). After a 30 min seated resting period, participants were instructed to lie in a comfortable supine position.…”
Section: Preliminary Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has been described as the gold standard in indirect calorimetry and has been validated in the measurement of RMR in both adults and children (Weissman et al 1990;Tissot et al 1995). After a 30 min seated resting period, participants were instructed to lie in a comfortable supine position.…”
Section: Preliminary Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metabolic carts, such as the Deltatrac, have been shown to be reliable instruments for measuring RMR (Takala et al, 1989;Weissman et al, 1990;Tissot et al, 1995). Despite the advantages of the Deltatrac, there are factors that deter its use (Nieman et al, 2003;St-Onge et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation and calibration of this device has previously been described. [9][10][11][12] The measurement error of the indirect calorimeter for whole-body VO 2 is 袭2% to 4% at an FIO 2 of 0.4. 10,12 Thus, observed VO 2 increases or decreases of more than 4% were considered not attributable to measurement error.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%