2019
DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.03.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical validation of scoring systems of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: applicability to Eastern cohorts?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the sources of heterogeneity were identified by excluding 1 study at a time. The heterogeneity decreased from I 2 = 62% to I 2 = 0% by excluding the study by Kang et al [ 28 ] in the analysis of diabetes mellitus. The result after excluding the sources of heterogeneity showed that diabetes mellitus was a significant protective factor of CR-POPF (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.35–0.74, P < .001) (Supplementary Figure 4, http://links.lww.com/MD/G805 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the sources of heterogeneity were identified by excluding 1 study at a time. The heterogeneity decreased from I 2 = 62% to I 2 = 0% by excluding the study by Kang et al [ 28 ] in the analysis of diabetes mellitus. The result after excluding the sources of heterogeneity showed that diabetes mellitus was a significant protective factor of CR-POPF (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.35–0.74, P < .001) (Supplementary Figure 4, http://links.lww.com/MD/G805 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The association of vascular resection and CR-POPF was assessed by 6 studies with 5462 patients. [ 20 , 21 , 28 , 32 , 33 , 36 ] There was no heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%), so the fixed-effects model was adopted. The result showed that intraoperative vascular resection was a significant protective factor of CR-POPF (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.39–0.83, P = .003) (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 26 ] To our knowledge, there is no predictive platform for POPF that includes POD1 DFA and there are limits in predicting POPF with the current known preoperative variables. [ 27 , 28 ] The development of a predictive system including POD1 DFA will be beneficial for re-evaluating the risks of POPF and patient management. Further research is also needed on the potential intrinsic risk factors including the genetic or pathologic characteristics of the patients or diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of traditional risk scoring systems, such as the original fistula risk score (o-FRS) [ 5 ] and the alternative fistula risk score (a-FRS) [ 6 ], have been used. However, several studies performed external validation and the predictability varied with the study population [ 7 8 11 12 ]. Therefore, our institution suggested new predictive models using nomograms and AI [ 9 10 ] and this study validated the predictability of the new platforms with an external cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on traditional risk factors, there were attempts to develop platforms for predicting POPF [ 5 6 ]. However, due to the limited predictive values of previous platforms [ 7 8 ], we developed new risk prediction platforms using nomograms [ 9 ] and artificial intelligence (AI) technology [ 10 ]. The nomogram consisting of 6 preoperatively available data provides a better insight into the risk factors and their contributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%