2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Validation of Atlas-based Auto-contours of Target Tissues and Critical Normal Tissue Structures in the Head & Neck

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon reviewing the publications, the majority investigating time saving reported substantial time reduction of 30-60% using AS compared to MD [1,6,14,23,25]. These results are consistent with earlier studies [17,[29][30][31]. Hu et al [31] reported significant time reduction of 87% for overall structure delineation in oropharynx and nasopharynx cancers.…”
Section: Time Savingsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Upon reviewing the publications, the majority investigating time saving reported substantial time reduction of 30-60% using AS compared to MD [1,6,14,23,25]. These results are consistent with earlier studies [17,[29][30][31]. Hu et al [31] reported significant time reduction of 87% for overall structure delineation in oropharynx and nasopharynx cancers.…”
Section: Time Savingsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Unedited autocontours of normal structures were reported to be usable without negatively affecting plan quality by Tsuji et al [11]. In two studies by Levendag et al [29,30] which also investigated the Table 3. Quality of study assessment using Jadad et al [26] (Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?…”
Section: Delineation Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to variations in patient anatomy, especially the bladder and rectum in patients with pelvic malignancy, it could be preferable to run multiple atlases to attain a better result. Utilising ABAS for this group of patients could potentially provide substantial gains in efficiency with improved consistency, as has been reported from studies conducted in the head and neck region and the brain …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Utilising ABAS for this group of patients could potentially provide substantial gains in efficiency with improved consistency, as has been reported from studies conducted in the head and neck region and the brain. [6][7][8] The primary goal of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy and clinical applicability of the ABAS software when auto-contouring male pelvic anatomy, specifically for prostate patients. We sought to improve our understanding of the performance and limitations of the ABAS software to help facilitate its introduction into routine clinical use for all prostate patients at our institution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%