2023
DOI: 10.2196/44650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Validation of an Artificial Intelligence–Based Tool for Automatic Estimation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Strain in Echocardiography: Protocol for a Two-Phase Prospective Cohort Study

Abstract: Background Echocardiography (ECHO) is a type of ultrasonographic procedure for examining the cardiac function and morphology, with functional parameters of the left ventricle (LV), such as the ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS), being important indicators. Estimation of LV-EF and LV-GLS is performed either manually or semiautomatically by cardiologists and requires a nonnegligible amount of time, while estimation accuracy depends on scan quality and the clinician’s experien… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is based on a plot analysis and it is adequate "to evaluate a bias between the mean differences, and to estimate an agreement interval, within which 95% of the differences of the second method, compared to the first one, fall" [49]. The choice for the validation method is also supported by the following facts: (i) it is one of the most used methods to investigate the agreement between different approaches that provide the same measure and it is especially common for studies within the clinical context [50][51][52][53][54][55]; (ii) the measuring principles underlying the VM device were validated using the same method [46].…”
Section: Testing and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is based on a plot analysis and it is adequate "to evaluate a bias between the mean differences, and to estimate an agreement interval, within which 95% of the differences of the second method, compared to the first one, fall" [49]. The choice for the validation method is also supported by the following facts: (i) it is one of the most used methods to investigate the agreement between different approaches that provide the same measure and it is especially common for studies within the clinical context [50][51][52][53][54][55]; (ii) the measuring principles underlying the VM device were validated using the same method [46].…”
Section: Testing and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%