2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical utility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal polymerase chain reaction assay in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
47
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have shown that nasal swab screening for MRSA colonization has a reliably high NPV and effectively identifies patients at low risk for LRTIs caused by MRSA. [6][7][8][9][10] The present study builds on previous data by showing a significant reduction in vancomycin therapy duration in the period after implementation of the CPA allowing pharmacists to order MRSA nasal swab PCR screening, with no significant between-group differences in median time from PCR order to result or MRSA nasal swab positivity rates. Several studies have shown a decrease in duration of therapy with implementation of pharmacistdriven screening test protocols.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Numerous studies have shown that nasal swab screening for MRSA colonization has a reliably high NPV and effectively identifies patients at low risk for LRTIs caused by MRSA. [6][7][8][9][10] The present study builds on previous data by showing a significant reduction in vancomycin therapy duration in the period after implementation of the CPA allowing pharmacists to order MRSA nasal swab PCR screening, with no significant between-group differences in median time from PCR order to result or MRSA nasal swab positivity rates. Several studies have shown a decrease in duration of therapy with implementation of pharmacistdriven screening test protocols.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…One could postulate that by decreasing the number of days a patient is on vancomycin for MRSA coverage in pneumonia that total healthcare costs would also be decreased because of fewer days in the hospital and less serum vancomycin levels being obtained. According to Smith et al, a $108 reduction in cost per patient was noted in medication-related costs following the implementation of a similar protocol [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 52 patients with negative MRSA swabs, only 3 (5.8%) later developed MRSA VAP. Smith and colleagues examined the clinical utility of MRSA nasal swabs before or within 48 hours of ICU admission in patients with nosocomial pneumonia and found a negative predictive value of 99.03% [12]. Patients who were continued on anti-MRSA therapy, specifically vancomycin, despite negative MRSA swab results had a significantly longer ICU length of stay.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%