1984
DOI: 10.3109/02844318409057405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical use of Laser Doppler Flowmetry in a Burns Unit

Abstract: Laser Doppler Flowmetry (LDF) is a new noninvasive technique by which microcirculation changes in tissue can be studied. This has been done in a Burns Unit on burned as well as non-burned patients (volunteers). There were no infection problems with this device in a Burns Unit. Four kHz was the upper wave length limit analysing the doppler signal from burns. A topical temperature load test was defined and used in different situations. Homogeneous flows in reference points from a control group were demonstrated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 90-s measurement was taken with data collected for the last 30 s over a 1-cm 2 area under a protective tent to minimize the effect of laboratory air currents. Laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI) evaluated cutaneous microcirculation (blood flux) using the MoorLDIt laser Doppler (Moor Instruments Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA) (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). The MoorLDIt settings were DC gain 5 0, flux gain 5 0, conc gain 5 2 (all gains were set against normal pig skin), background threshold 5 200, distance 5 20 cm, scan size 5 large, scan speed 5 10 ms/pixel, DC image resolution 5 256 Â 256 pixels, and blood flux units set to 'perfusion.'…”
Section: Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 90-s measurement was taken with data collected for the last 30 s over a 1-cm 2 area under a protective tent to minimize the effect of laboratory air currents. Laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI) evaluated cutaneous microcirculation (blood flux) using the MoorLDIt laser Doppler (Moor Instruments Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA) (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). The MoorLDIt settings were DC gain 5 0, flux gain 5 0, conc gain 5 2 (all gains were set against normal pig skin), background threshold 5 200, distance 5 20 cm, scan size 5 large, scan speed 5 10 ms/pixel, DC image resolution 5 256 Â 256 pixels, and blood flux units set to 'perfusion.'…”
Section: Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideal method of analysis of burn depth should be non invasive, safe and acceptable to the patients, user‐friendly and cost‐effective (7,25). Laser Doppler appears to meet most criteria — it is non contact and non invasive, painless, easy to perform and virtually no interoperator error.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micheels et al . (7) published the first reported use of laser Doppler for assessing burn depth. Alsbjourn et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Their follow-up study tested the ability to measure microcirculation in a burn wound and the ability to measure the effect of vasodilatation. 108 They showed a correlation between the clinical assessment of burn depth and the local blood flow. In their final study, 109 they scanned 15 burn patients on the third postinjury day and compared the measurements from the laser to clinical judgment and wound biopsies.…”
Section: Laser Dopplermentioning
confidence: 97%