Clinical time and postoperative sensitivity after use of bulk-fill (syringe and capsule) vs. incremental filling composites: a randomized clinical trial

Tardem, Chane; Albuquerque, Elisa Gomes de; Lopes, Letícia de Souza; Marins, Stella Soares; Calazans, Fernanda Signorelli; Poubel, Luiz Augusto; Barcelos, Roberta; Barceleiro, Marcos de Oliveira

doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0089

Cited by 39 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This corroborates a previous study [12]. It has been shown, however, that deeper cavities presents more postoperative sensitivity compared to shallower cavities [26,32]. The differences found may be due to the different materials and methodological approaches [33].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…From the patient's point of view, a higher postoperative sensitivity would be an undesired outcome [26]. The objective of present study was to evaluate the presence of postoperative sensitivity in posterior teeth restored with different types of resin composites and adhesive systems as well as the influence of the depth and extension of the dental cavity.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical Evaluation of Postoperative Sensitivity in Class I Resin Composite Restorations

Cardoso

Veras

Pedrosa

et al. 2020

BDS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the postoperative sensitivity in posterior restorations with different resin composites and adhesive systems as well as the influence of the depth and extent of the dental cavity. Material and Methods: A double-blind clinical trial was carried out with 80 class I restorations of 16 patients. The participants were divided into 4 groups according to the adhesive system + composite: F + P (Filtek P90™ + P90™); R + S (Rok™ + Stae™); P + A (P60™ + Adper SE PLUS™); E + X (Evolux™ + XPBond™ Adhesive). After 7, 15 and 30 days, the presence of postoperative sensitivity was evaluated and classified according to type and intensity. The data were submitted to Pearson's chi-square test, Fisher's exact teste, Student’s t-test and ANOVA. A significance level of 5% was used for all tests. Results: The presence of postoperative sensitivity was approximately 6% of the total sample. The sensitivity decreased with the evaluation time, with the smallest reduction occurring from the 7-day evaluation compared to the other evaluations. Conclusion: There was found no evidence of influence of the resin composite and adhesive type, depth and extension of the cavities for the presence of postoperative sensitivity. Keywords Dentistry; Dentin sensitivity; Adhesives; Composite resins.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Evaluation of Postoperative Sensitivity in Class I Resin Composite Restorations

Cardoso

Veras

Pedrosa

et al. 2020

BDS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It brings the deleterious effects of this phenomenon for restoration [23,24]. These ndings also corroborate the results of the recent study [30], who observed a signi cant reduction in the average time to make a restoration when using bulk-ll composites in different presentation modes, regardless of the adhesive strategy used.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Clinical Performance Between two Types of Composite Resin in Direct Restorations and Its Impacts on QoL

Lima¹,

Lima²,

Almeida³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Public health problems associated with oral disease affect large numbers of people in countries around the world. Dental caries continues to be the main cause of premature tooth loss in patients and can negatively affect the Quality of life (QoL) related to oral health for both the individual and their family. Depending on their stage of advancement of caries, a restorative procedure is required, since caries injuries generally involve changing the shape, function or esthetics, restoring is intended to extend the life of the teeth, The purpose of this study was evaluated direct restorations on posterior teeth with conventional and bulk-fill composite resins performed by public health professionals and their effect on Quality of life. Methods: The sample consisted of 100 teeth in 50 patients. The teeth selected for the restorative procedure were randomized in the two study groups according to restorative material. Group 1 - Bulk fill composite resin, or Group 2 - Conventional composite resin. At the end of 12 and 24 months, the restorations were evaluated according to USPHS criteria, by two evaluators. To evaluate the Quality of Life related to oral health, Oral Health Impact Profile – 14 (OHIP-14) was used before and after restorative treatment (12 months). Results: After 12 months, 90 restorations were evaluated that showed no statistical difference (p> 0.05), after 24 months, 80 restorations evaluated and also showed similar clinical performance and no statistical difference (p> 0.05). The analysis of quality of life detected a statistical difference only in the psychological discomfort domain (p = 0.024), improving their values at the end of the treatment. There are no differences between the clinical performance with conventional resins or bulk-fill system. Restorative treatment improved the perception of concern and stress suffered by patients by dental problems. Clinical Trial Registry: RBR-7hbmjp

show abstract

“…Treze dos 18 estudos analisados avaliaram o comportamento clínico dos Sistemas Adesivos Universais fabricados pela 3M ESPE ("Scotchbond Universal" e "Single Bond Universal"). [22][23][24][25]27,29,[31][32][33]35,[37][38][39] De acordo com a assessoria da 3M ESPE, no Brasil, trata-se de idêntico produto, todavia por questões de mercado consumidor os mesmos são comercializados com sinonímia diferente.…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

“…O MDP (10-metacriloiloxidecil Dihidrogênio Fosfato) foi o principal monômero funcional testado nos estudos analisados, estando o mesmo presente nos "SA-Uni" Scotchbond Universal ® /Single Bond Universal ® , [22][23][24][25]27,29,[31][32][33]35,[37][38][39] Clearfil Universal Bond ® , 34,36 Xeno Select ® , 26 All-bond Universal ® , G-Premio Bond ® e Tetric N-Bond Universal ® . 30 O PENTA (Dipentaeritritol pentacrilato monofosfato) está na composição do Prime & Bond Elect ® .…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

Desempenho clínico dos sistemas adesivos universais: revisão crítica

Carvalho¹,

Quadé²,

Uchoa-Junior³

et al. 2020

Rev. Fac. Odontol. Lins

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo: Analisar e discutir, por meio de uma revisão crítica da literatura, o comportamento clínico dos sistemas adesivos odontológicos “universal” ou “multimodo”. Métodos: A pesquisa bibliográfica foi restrita às bases de dados eletrônicas: MEDLINE e SciELO, utilizando os seguintes filtros: data de publicação [2014-2019], língua [portuguesa e/ou inglesa], descritores e suas combinações: “Universal adhesive”; “Multimode adhesive”; “Adesivos e Universal”; “Adesivos dentinários e Universal”; “Adesivos dentários e Universal”. Os seguintes critérios de inclusão foram adotados: estudos clínicos, dentição permanente, modos de aplicação, restaurações diretas e resinas compostas. Resultados: Dos 317 artigos identificados, 18 destes foram incluídos na análise sendo que o período de acompanhamento clínico variou entre 6 semanas e 36 meses. Conclusão: Considerando os estudos analisados de curto período de acompanhamento clínico, pode-se afirmar que os sistemas adesivos universais: (1) podem ser utilizados em dentes permanentes, a serem restaurados utilizando resina composta; (2) não devem ser aplicados sobre exposições pulpares diretas; (3) devem ser aplicados preferencialmente nos casos clínicos de procedimentos restauradores de Lesões Cervicais não Cariosas no modo Condicionamento Ácido Total ou Condicionamento Seletivo em Esmalte e no modo Condicionamento Seletivo em Esmalte nos casos de lesões cariosas.

show abstract

Clinical time and postoperative sensitivity after use of bulk-fill (syringe and capsule) vs. incremental filling composites: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract: Elisa Gomes ALBUQUERQUE (a) Letícia de Souza LOPES (b) Stella Soares MARINS (a) Fernanda Signorelli CALAZANS (a) Luiz Augusto POUBEL (a) Roberta BARCELOS (a) Marcos de Oliveira BARCELEIRO (a)

Cited by 39 publications

References 17 publications

Clinical Evaluation of Postoperative Sensitivity in Class I Resin Composite Restorations

Clinical Evaluation of Postoperative Sensitivity in Class I Resin Composite Restorations

Clinical Performance Between two Types of Composite Resin in Direct Restorations and Its Impacts on QoL

Desempenho clínico dos sistemas adesivos universais: revisão crítica

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About