2010
DOI: 10.1001/archoto.2010.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Thresholds for When to Test for Retrocochlear Lesions: Pro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The criteria for assessing abnormal responses on ABR tests have varied considerably among studies. Some authors argue that the ABR has no place in today's management and that MRI should be the initial screening test when there is a suspicion of VS [ 18 ]. Other authors argue that there is still a place for the ABR in the diagnostic algorithm due to the high cost and lower availability of MRI [ 19 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria for assessing abnormal responses on ABR tests have varied considerably among studies. Some authors argue that the ABR has no place in today's management and that MRI should be the initial screening test when there is a suspicion of VS [ 18 ]. Other authors argue that there is still a place for the ABR in the diagnostic algorithm due to the high cost and lower availability of MRI [ 19 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Cost analyses have shown that ABR-MRI screening algorithms may not be cost-effective owing to the high false-negative rate of ABR and should be abandoned. 7,11 However, ABR testing may be useful in certain clinical scenarios, such as in older patients in whom the missed diagnosis of a small tumor may be less consequential or if an MRI is contraindicated owing to the presence of metallic implants (eg, pacemakers, aneurysm clips). 12,15 A recent meta-analysis evaluating the use of ABR testing in diagnosing VS noted high sensitivity and specificity (pooled sensitivity of 95.6% for tumors >1 cm and 85.8% for tumors <1 cm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical criteria used to perform the MRI and criteria previously reported to be associated with retrocochlear disease were recorded, including the degree and type of ASNHL, "acute" (<72 hours) onset of symptoms, unilateral tinnitus, bilateral tinnitus, and generalized disequilibrium or vertigo. 1,6,7 This retrospective medical record review was approved by the Henry Ford Hospital institutional review board, which waived participant written informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, not all cases of asymmetrical sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) have retro-cochlear pathology and till date debate still exists among researchers regarding the use of MRI in all the cases presenting as asymmetrical SNHL. [1][2][3][4] MRI as an expensive imaging technique should have an effective utilization strategies to minimize the rising imaging-related health care costs. 4,5 The MRI referral rates by general practitioners are increasing to audiology departments, which may have a significant impact on service provision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%