2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical survival and performance of premolars restored with direct or indirect cusp-replacing resin composite restorations with a mean follow-up of 14 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regrettably, there is a lack of studies in the literature that directly compare the survival rates of direct and indirect composite restorations. In a recent retrospective long-term follow-up study, the authors found no statistically significant difference in survival rates between direct and indirect composite cusp-replacing restorations [ 9 ]. Therefore, both direct and indirect resin composite restorations are considered suitable treatment options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regrettably, there is a lack of studies in the literature that directly compare the survival rates of direct and indirect composite restorations. In a recent retrospective long-term follow-up study, the authors found no statistically significant difference in survival rates between direct and indirect composite cusp-replacing restorations [ 9 ]. Therefore, both direct and indirect resin composite restorations are considered suitable treatment options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, both direct and indirect resin composite restorations are considered suitable treatment options. However, considering the longer treatment time and higher costs associated with indirect restorations, the direct technique is favored [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%