1952
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)35130-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Studies of Magnesium Metabolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1955
1955
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of the well-documented magnesuric property of diuretics (Martin et al, 1952;Barker et al, 1959;Smith et al, 1959;Wacker, 1961;Demartini et al, 1967;Parfitt, 1969) the present patients, who had been taking diuretics on average for 3-3 years, had probably lost quite large quantities of magnesium in the urine. One of the major factors in magnesium conservation is reduction of urinary magnesium excretion, so that if excretion is not stimulated by diuretics the obligatory urinary loss may be reduced to less than 1 mEq/day when dietary magnesium is severely restricted (Barnes et al, 1958).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In view of the well-documented magnesuric property of diuretics (Martin et al, 1952;Barker et al, 1959;Smith et al, 1959;Wacker, 1961;Demartini et al, 1967;Parfitt, 1969) the present patients, who had been taking diuretics on average for 3-3 years, had probably lost quite large quantities of magnesium in the urine. One of the major factors in magnesium conservation is reduction of urinary magnesium excretion, so that if excretion is not stimulated by diuretics the obligatory urinary loss may be reduced to less than 1 mEq/day when dietary magnesium is severely restricted (Barnes et al, 1958).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Administration of diuretics may lead to significant urinary loss of magnesium (Martin et al, 1952;Barker et al, 1959;Smith et al, 1959;Wacker, 1961;Demartini et al, 1967;Parfitt, 1969). Patients with chronic valvular heart disease are often given long-term diuretic therapy for heart failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diuretics have been shown to produce very different effects on the urinary excretion of magnesium. Many of them cause an increased magnesuria; these include the mercurial diuretics (merbaphen: Keith & Whelan, 1926-27; meralluride: Martin, Mehl & Wertman, 1952; Barker, Elkinton & Clark, 1959;Demartini, Briscoe & Ragan, 1967;mersalyl: Smith, Kyriakopoulos, Mock & Hammarsten, 1959;Barker et al 1959;Smith, Hammarsten & Eliel, 1960;Hanze, 1960;chlormerodrin: Walser & Trounce, 1961;mercurin: Wesson, 1962), thiazidic diuretics (chlorothiazide: Robinson, Murdaugh & Peschel, 1958McCollister, Prasad, Doe & Flink, 1958;Smith et al 1959Smith et al , 1960Hainze, 1960;Demartini et al 1967; hydrochlorothiazide: Hanze, 1960;Wacker, 1961) and P. LAB VOR AND Y. RAYSSIGUIER various diuretic substances: ethacrynic acid (Demartini et al 1967;Duarte, 1968; Abdelhamid, Seyberth & Hinze, 1969), furosemide (Duarte, 1968;Pors-Nielsen, Andersen & Steven, 1969), mefruside (Abdelhamid et al 1969) and ethanol (McCollister et al 1958). There is only one discrepancy, reported by Walser & Trounce (1961) concerning the effect of thiazide diuretics, which decrease excretion of alkaline earths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With diuretics causing hypermagnesuria, there is usually a concomitant hypomagnesaemia (Martin et al 1952;Smith et al 1959Smith et al , 1960Wacker, 1961;Duarte, 1968;Halvorsen, 1970) which seems to be a direct effect of the magnesium diuresis, because injection into the animal of an amount of magnesium equal to that lost in the urine prevents the hypomagnesaemia (Wesson, 1962;Duarte, 1968).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the majority of these instances, the clinical picture has been complicated by concurrent deficiencies, more or less severe, of other ions. Furthermore, patients with hypomagnesaemia exhibiting none of these symptoms have been observed (Martin, Mehl, and Wertman, 1952).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%