Clinical skill learning for tomorrow's doctors -a step towards better obstetric care

Patil, Gayathri L.; Pujar, Tejaswi V.; Bn, Seema; Patil, Linganagouda S.; Nayak, Sushanth R.; Chigateri, Seema; Deshpande, Radhika; Shashikala, P

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20161672

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Medical school teachers all over the world are now increasingly using this method to teach procedural and psychomotor skills to undergraduates [ 11 ]. It has been seen that the imparting of knowledge does not always and necessarily translate into clinical skill mastery, using the traditional bedside teaching technique [ 12 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Peyton’s Four-Step Approach With the Conventional Bedside Technique in Teaching Clinical Examination Skills to Medical Students

Varghese,

Abraham

2024

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Conventional bedside teaching (CBT) is an integral and classical method for imparting clinical skills to undergraduates in medical schools. It is a traditionally successful approach, especially when it comes to imparting patient-doctor relationship skills and knowledge on clinical management. Peyton’s four-step approach (PFSA) is one of the newer structured instructional approaches for teaching-learning, especially for imparting procedural and complex psychomotor skills. The present study compares the application of PFSA in teaching complex systemic examination skills to the CBT technique in teaching the same skill to MBBS students. The impact of the acquisition of this examination skill was assessed statistically to compare PFSA and CBT methodologies. Methodology: The target population was MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery) students; for this study, the phase II MBBS students were considered as the study population since they were relatively naïve to clinical bedside examination skills. Students were allotted groups and they were taught clinical skills through CBT and PFSA separately. Using the OpenEpi toolkit Version 3 open-source sample size calculator for comparing two means, the sample size was 30 students in each group. The students were assessed for their competency and were also made to fill out a feedback questionnaire to compare the two methods of education dispensing. Results: The results of this study showed that PFSA is definitely suitable for teaching clinical examination skills. The acquisition of skills was found non-inferior to CBT while the retention of these skills was found to be equally good or even superior with PFSA than with CBT. Conclusion: PFSA has already been proven to be a good teaching method for the acquisition of complex procedural skills. This study expands the role of PFSA in teaching clinical bedside examination skills to medical students. Further large-scale studies may clarify the learning impact and outcomes of PFSA in clinical bedside teaching.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%