2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2008.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical significance of MEFV mutations in ankylosing spondylitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…MEFV mutation frequency was found to be increased as compared to controls in 2 of 3 previous studies (9-11). However, in all studies, M684V mutation was the most common mutation detected in AS patients and the frequency of M694V mutation was increased in AS patients as compared to controls (9)(10)(11)17). In this regard, our results are consistent with the previous results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…MEFV mutation frequency was found to be increased as compared to controls in 2 of 3 previous studies (9-11). However, in all studies, M684V mutation was the most common mutation detected in AS patients and the frequency of M694V mutation was increased in AS patients as compared to controls (9)(10)(11)17). In this regard, our results are consistent with the previous results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We did not find any clinical and laboratory difference between MEFV mutation carriers and noncarriers in AS patients. The frequency of MEFV mutation carriers was reported between 22% and 30% in AS patients (9)(10)(11)16). MEFV mutation frequency was found to be increased as compared to controls in 2 of 3 previous studies (9-11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, Cinar et al 19 demonstrated the MEFV mutation rate in AS patients to be 30.5%, but a control group was not used in that study either. Durmus et al 37 compared the MEFV mutation rate in AS patients with that of healthy individuals, but no statistically significant difference was determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%