2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical significance of Her-2/neu overexpression in uterine serous carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
11
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings, which have been recently confirmed by other groups (Diaz-Montes et al, 2006), as well as those in cooperative multicentric studies reported by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (Grushko et al, 2008), have highlighted the potential of targeting HER2/neu as a new therapeutic marker in patients harbouring aggressive type II carcinomas such as USPC. Similar to the great promise for treatment of metastatic breast cancer in patients harbouring tumours with proven amplification or strong (i.e., 3 þ by IHC) HER2/neu overexpression, endometrial cancer patients with disease refractory to standard treatment modalities may potentially benefit from HER2/neu-targeted therapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…These findings, which have been recently confirmed by other groups (Diaz-Montes et al, 2006), as well as those in cooperative multicentric studies reported by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (Grushko et al, 2008), have highlighted the potential of targeting HER2/neu as a new therapeutic marker in patients harbouring aggressive type II carcinomas such as USPC. Similar to the great promise for treatment of metastatic breast cancer in patients harbouring tumours with proven amplification or strong (i.e., 3 þ by IHC) HER2/neu overexpression, endometrial cancer patients with disease refractory to standard treatment modalities may potentially benefit from HER2/neu-targeted therapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Overexpression of Her-2/neu was seen in 50.0% (11/22) of UPSC patients with advanced disease, compared to 14.3% (2/14) of patients with early disease. Similar findings were reported by Slomovitz, Santin, and Díaz-Montes et al, in which overexpression of Her-2/neu in patients with advanced disease were 24%~81.8%, compared to 8%~28.6% of patients with early disease [19, 20, 30]. Díaz-Montes et al also demonstrated that overexpression of Her-2/neu was associated with higher Ki-67 index, larger tumor sizes, and worse survival outcome.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Previous studies evaluating the HER2 status in endometrial carcinomas suffered from several limitations, including inappropriate case selection and lack of standardized HER2 testing and scoring criteria, leading to a wide range-14-80%-of reported HER2 positivity in endometrial serous carcinoma [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] (Buza et al, in press). One of the largest studies-a phase II clinical trial of singleagent trastuzumab in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma-for example, has been previously criticized for including a large number of type I and mixed endometrial carcinomas, and the histological subtype was not specified in nearly half of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] Although HER2/neu has been studied in endometrial cancer for over 15 years, standard testing methods or scoring guidelines are yet to be developed. The reported rates of HER2 overexpression in endometrial serous carcinoma range between 14 and 80%, due to-at least in part-the significant variation in the HER2 testing methods, interpretation and scoring criteria used [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] (Buza et al, in press).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%