2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00388-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical significance of gross hematuria and its evaluation in patients receiving anticoagulant and aspirin treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…203,204 A retrospective analysis of all patients presenting with gross hematuria over a 9-year period while taking anticoagulant or aspirin therapy found that 25% (six of 25) of those patients presenting with hematuria were found to have a tumor. 205 Several studies addressed the question of GI bleeding. A retrospective series of 166 patients presenting with lower GI bleeding, with 100 of the patients taking an antiplatelet or anticoagulant and 66 not, found that nine of 88 (10.2%) patients taking anticoagulants had colon cancer compared with two of 62 (3.2%) not taking anticoagulants.…”
Section: Investigating Anticoagulant-associated Bleedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…203,204 A retrospective analysis of all patients presenting with gross hematuria over a 9-year period while taking anticoagulant or aspirin therapy found that 25% (six of 25) of those patients presenting with hematuria were found to have a tumor. 205 Several studies addressed the question of GI bleeding. A retrospective series of 166 patients presenting with lower GI bleeding, with 100 of the patients taking an antiplatelet or anticoagulant and 66 not, found that nine of 88 (10.2%) patients taking anticoagulants had colon cancer compared with two of 62 (3.2%) not taking anticoagulants.…”
Section: Investigating Anticoagulant-associated Bleedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, genitourinary tract pathology including carcinoma, calculi, renal infarction, and/or infection was noted in 30-60% of patients taking warfarin and presenting with hematuria, with considerable variance between studies. 9,13, 14 The strengths of the present study are the relatively large sample size, and the inclusion of a propensity score-matched control group of patients who were not taking warfarin. This study emphasizes the importance of complete evaluation of hematuria in patients receiving anticoagulation therapy.…”
Section: Clinical Significance Of Hematuria In Oat Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,11,13, 14 Furthermore, in some forms of malignancy such as stomach or colorectal cancer, anticoagulantrelated gastrointestinal bleeding was found to facilitate early detection of malignant gastrointestinal lesions. 15, 16 Thorough evaluation of anticoagulant-related bleeding is critical to detect malignancy during the potential window of curability, 17 but, although hematuria is not an uncommon complication in patients with OAT, there are limited data on the impact of anticoagulation on evaluation and management.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an underlying malignancy was found in 24% and 7% of patients in two separate series and thorough urological evaluation should not be foregone in patients receiving anticoagulants [16, 17]. …”
Section: Investigation Of Haematuriamentioning
confidence: 99%